Difference between revisions of "ESC 2011 09 19"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | ===EarthCube Paper: http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Discovery_White_Paper=== | |
| − | + | * EarthCube site for discussion and submission is http://earthcube.ning.com/ | |
| − | + | * Our White Paper needs an Executive Summary | |
| − | + | * Given the breakdown on topics on the Ning site, ESIP may submit this Technology paper, plus a Governance paper | |
| − | + | * '''AI: ESIP higher-ups (ExCom? Carol?) consider authoring a 1-pg paper on Governance.''' | |
| − | ** '''AI: Chris Lynnes - write Executive Summary for Discovery white paper''' | + | * '''AI: Everyone - read Discovery white paper, discuss if desired, please "sign" (using <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) |
| − | + | * '''AI: Chris Lynnes - write Executive Summary for Discovery white paper''' | |
| − | + | ===Ideas for Winter Meeting sessions=== | |
| − | + | * Erin: link up with student fellows, working on a half day track centered around climate, including how clusters can work better | |
| − | + | * AI: Chris Lynnes - reach out to student fellows about (1) participation in ESC Cluster and (2) what kind of help they might need | |
| − | + | * User Story Session: focus on a specific, real-life collaboration we would like to enable/facilitate | |
| − | + | ** '''AI: Cluster - propose specific collaborations''' | |
| − | + | * Technical Session: Possible demonstration or development within the Products and Services Testbed (Ken K.) | |
| − | + | * Programmatic Session: Invite key program managers to give us advice on how to move the project forward | |
| − | + | ** Alternative proposed to Visioneers: panel discussion among program managers (NASA, NOAA, EPA, NSF, ...) | |
| − | + | * Organizational Session: Recap EarthCube Charrette ideas and outcomes, figure out how we fit in with them, and replan accordingly | |
| − | + | * Organizational Session: Figure out how to make progress along all four dimensions (programmatic, social, technical and user story) without losing focus or splintering | |
| − | + | **e.g., form subgroups with regular tag-ups | |
| − | * | + | **or...design an "organization" that enables emergent and recombinant development. (Would this mirror how a real ESC would need to self-organize? Is this even feasible?) |
| − | * | + | * Special Speaker: Author of the [[Media:UnderstandingInfrastructure.pdf|Understanding Infrastructure report (pdf)]]. Mark suggests Steve Jackson. |
| + | * Technical Session: Hackathon based on a current collaboration platform (e.g., NEX, myexperiment.org, ManyEyes, ...] | ||
| + | * Technical Session: ESC Architecture/Design Charette (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charrette) | ||
| + | N.B.: This is too many sessions for a single ESIP meeting. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''AI: Chris Lynnes - put out poll to see which ideas draw interest''' | ||
Latest revision as of 14:57, September 21, 2011
EarthCube Paper: http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Discovery_White_Paper
- EarthCube site for discussion and submission is http://earthcube.ning.com/
- Our White Paper needs an Executive Summary
- Given the breakdown on topics on the Ning site, ESIP may submit this Technology paper, plus a Governance paper
- AI: ESIP higher-ups (ExCom? Carol?) consider authoring a 1-pg paper on Governance.
- AI: Everyone - read Discovery white paper, discuss if desired, please "sign" (using ~~~~)
- AI: Chris Lynnes - write Executive Summary for Discovery white paper
Ideas for Winter Meeting sessions
- Erin: link up with student fellows, working on a half day track centered around climate, including how clusters can work better
- AI: Chris Lynnes - reach out to student fellows about (1) participation in ESC Cluster and (2) what kind of help they might need
- User Story Session: focus on a specific, real-life collaboration we would like to enable/facilitate
- AI: Cluster - propose specific collaborations
- Technical Session: Possible demonstration or development within the Products and Services Testbed (Ken K.)
- Programmatic Session: Invite key program managers to give us advice on how to move the project forward
- Alternative proposed to Visioneers: panel discussion among program managers (NASA, NOAA, EPA, NSF, ...)
- Organizational Session: Recap EarthCube Charrette ideas and outcomes, figure out how we fit in with them, and replan accordingly
- Organizational Session: Figure out how to make progress along all four dimensions (programmatic, social, technical and user story) without losing focus or splintering
- e.g., form subgroups with regular tag-ups
- or...design an "organization" that enables emergent and recombinant development. (Would this mirror how a real ESC would need to self-organize? Is this even feasible?)
- Special Speaker: Author of the Understanding Infrastructure report (pdf). Mark suggests Steve Jackson.
- Technical Session: Hackathon based on a current collaboration platform (e.g., NEX, myexperiment.org, ManyEyes, ...]
- Technical Session: ESC Architecture/Design Charette (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charrette)
N.B.: This is too many sessions for a single ESIP meeting.
AI: Chris Lynnes - put out poll to see which ideas draw interest
