Difference between revisions of "EE CompliancePatternTrend"

Latest revision as of 16:55, July 11, 2008

Three-year aggregates of PM2.5. Left Images: Annual average PM10: Right Images: 98th Percentile.

Note the remarkable decline of both PM2.5 matric in the period 2000-2006

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== Spatial and Temporal Pattern of PM2.5 Compliance (Approximate)==
+[[Exceptional_Air_Pollution_Event_Analysis_Community_Workspace|< Back to Exceptional Event Workspace]]<br>
-===Bachground===
+[[Evidence for Flagging Exceptional Events|Required Evidence for Flagging Exceptional Events]]
-[[Image:EE_ButForSchematics.png|150px|left]]  [[Image:Image-EE NoButFor1Schematics.png|150px]]  [[Image:Image-EE NoButFor2Schematics.png|150px]]
+__TOC__
-According to the EE Rule, observationas can be EE-flagged if the concentration exceeds the standard due to the exceptional event. The EE flag is not appropriate if the exceedance is due to controllable event does not explicity ...
-Thus, the geographic areas that are on the boarder of non-compliance are particularly sensiticwe
+=== PM2.5 Concentration Trend 2000-2006 ===
+Three-year aggregates of PM2.5. Left Images: Annual average PM10: Right Images: 98th Percentile.
-===Data, Procedures, Tools===
+Note the remarkable decline of both PM2.5 matric in the period 2000-2006
 <html>
@@ Line 50: / Line 49: @@
 <p>
 </html>
+[[Image:2000_04_FRMPM25_Avg.png|400px]] [[Image:2005_08_FRMPM25_Avg.png|400px]]