Difference between revisions of "Draft Excom Minutes"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
m
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Meeting called to order at 2:10 by Karl Benedict  
 
Meeting called to order at 2:10 by Karl Benedict  
  
# Welcome and Introductions - Welcome to new members, Brian, Emily, Roberta and Chris
+
1. Welcome and Introductions
# Approval of [[Draft Excom Minutes| February minutes]] -Chuck made a motion to adopt the minutes as drafted. The motion was seconded by Emily Law. Without discussion, the minutes were approved by acclamation.<br>
+
2. Approval of [[Draft Excom Minutes| February minutes]]
# Commons Governance Working Group Report ([http://commons.esipfed.org/node/1447 Governance Document]) - The steering committee established guidance. One outcome was to differntiate the Commons from other ESIP web assets. The Wiki as collaboration space and esipfed.org is front-forward facing website. The Commons is for final products.  
+
::Chuck Hutchinson made a motion to adopt the minutes as drafted. The motion was seconded by Emily Law. Without discussion, the minutes were approved by acclamation.<br>
#* Core principles: (1) Light weight, so that content areas are managed by experts  (2) Least restrictive licensing (3)  Persistence to access for resources  
+
3. Commons Governance Working Group Report ([http://commons.esipfed.org/node/1447 Governance Document])
#* Steering Committee made up of .... ; Steering committee more like a working group - how does it fit best?
+
::The Commons Governance Steering committee established draft guidance. One outcome was to formalize the differentiation of the Commons from other ESIP web assets. The Wiki remains as a collaboration space and esipfed.org is front-forward facing website. The Commons is for final products.  
#** Content area editors - identify experts ensure style
+
::* Core principles: (1) Light weight, so that content areas are managed by experts  (2) Least restrictive licensing (3)  Persistence to access for resources  
#** Content contributors
+
::* Steering Committee made up of .... ; Steering committee more like a working group - how does it fit best?
#** Admin - Operational/Maintenance  
+
::** Content area editors - identify experts ensure style
#** Users - viewers of content  
+
::** Content contributors
#** Group modified the steering committee to include a member of C&B  
+
::** Admin - Operational/Maintenance  
#* Two license - contributed content micro article/meeting sessions/modules - default is cc-by ; option for public domain - don't have authority to assert copyright.
+
::** Users - viewers of content  
#* Style guide will be developed with content editors. Will also work through workflows for specific content.  
+
::** Group modified the steering committee to include a member of C&B  
#* Motion to adopt as modified - Tamara/ John; No discussion. Without discussion, governace doc was approved by acclamation
+
::* Two license - contributed content micro article/meeting sessions/modules - default is cc-by ; option for public domain - don't have authority to assert copyright.
# Summer Planning & Travel Impacts ([[Summer 2013 Meeting|Planning Page]]) - Talked to both NASA and NOAA program managers. We are on the conferencing radars. NOAA numbers will likely be down. The call for sessions went out - we have 12 so far. We have plenary programs in the works. Excom discussed ability to travel.  
+
:* Style guide will be developed with content editors. Will also work through workflows for specific content.  
# Revisiting Award Review Criteria - item postponed because Annette was absent to lead.  
+
:* Motion to adopt as modified - Tamara/ John; No discussion. Without discussion, governace doc was approved by acclamation
# Committee Reports
+
4.  Summer Planning & Travel Impacts ([[Summer 2013 Meeting|Planning Page]]) - Talked to both NASA and NOAA program managers. We are on the conferencing radars. NOAA numbers will likely be down. The call for sessions went out - we have 12 so far. We have plenary programs in the works. Excom discussed ability to travel.  
#* Partnership - 7 new partners; Set-up time to meet and review.   
+
5.  Revisiting Award Review Criteria - item postponed because Annette was absent to lead.  
# Other Business - No business
+
6. Committee Reports
 
+
::* Partnership - 7 new partners; Setting up a time to meet and review the applications.   
Meeting adjourned - 1:43.
+
7. Other Business
 +
::No other business was offered. The meeting adjourned at 1:43.

Revision as of 10:51, April 26, 2013

ESIP Federation Executive Committee, April 11, 2013

Participants: Carol Meyer, Erin Robinson, John Scialdone, Emily Law, Brian Wee, Karl Benedict, Stefan Falke, Chuck Hutchinson, Tamara Ledley

Meeting called to order at 2:10 by Karl Benedict

1. Welcome and Introductions 2. Approval of February minutes

Chuck Hutchinson made a motion to adopt the minutes as drafted. The motion was seconded by Emily Law. Without discussion, the minutes were approved by acclamation.

3. Commons Governance Working Group Report (Governance Document)

The Commons Governance Steering committee established draft guidance. One outcome was to formalize the differentiation of the Commons from other ESIP web assets. The Wiki remains as a collaboration space and esipfed.org is front-forward facing website. The Commons is for final products.
  • Core principles: (1) Light weight, so that content areas are managed by experts (2) Least restrictive licensing (3) Persistence to access for resources
  • Steering Committee made up of .... ; Steering committee more like a working group - how does it fit best?
    • Content area editors - identify experts ensure style
    • Content contributors
    • Admin - Operational/Maintenance
    • Users - viewers of content
    • Group modified the steering committee to include a member of C&B
  • Two license - contributed content micro article/meeting sessions/modules - default is cc-by ; option for public domain - don't have authority to assert copyright.
  • Style guide will be developed with content editors. Will also work through workflows for specific content.
  • Motion to adopt as modified - Tamara/ John; No discussion. Without discussion, governace doc was approved by acclamation

4. Summer Planning & Travel Impacts (Planning Page) - Talked to both NASA and NOAA program managers. We are on the conferencing radars. NOAA numbers will likely be down. The call for sessions went out - we have 12 so far. We have plenary programs in the works. Excom discussed ability to travel. 5. Revisiting Award Review Criteria - item postponed because Annette was absent to lead. 6. Committee Reports

  • Partnership - 7 new partners; Setting up a time to meet and review the applications.

7. Other Business

No other business was offered. The meeting adjourned at 1:43.