Difference between revisions of "Draft Excom Minutes"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''ESIP Federation Executive Committee, February 14, 2013'''
 
'''ESIP Federation Executive Committee, February 14, 2013'''
  
Participants: Carol Meyer, Curt Tilmes, Erin Robinson, Annette Schloss, John Scialdone, Emily Law, Chris Mattman, Roberta Johnson, Brian Wee, Matt Austin, Steve Berrick
+
Participants: Carol Meyer, Erin Robinson, John Scialdone, Emily Law, Brian Wee, Karl Benedict, Stefan Falke, Chuck Hutchinson, Tamara Ledley
  
 
Meeting called to order at 2:10 by Karl Benedict  
 
Meeting called to order at 2:10 by Karl Benedict  
  
 
# Welcome and Introductions - Welcome to new members, Brian, Emily, Roberta and Chris  
 
# Welcome and Introductions - Welcome to new members, Brian, Emily, Roberta and Chris  
# Approval of [[Draft Excom Minutes| November minutes]] -Chuck made a motion to adopt the minutes as drafted. The motion was seconded by Emily Law. Without discussion, the minutes were approved by acclamation.<br>
+
# Approval of [[Draft Excom Minutes| February minutes]] -Chuck made a motion to adopt the minutes as drafted. The motion was seconded by Emily Law. Without discussion, the minutes were approved by acclamation.<br>
 
# Commons Governance Working Group Report ([http://commons.esipfed.org/node/1447 Governance Document]) - The steering committee established guidance. One outcome was to differntiate the Commons from other ESIP web assets. The Wiki as collaboration space and esipfed.org is front-forward facing website. The Commons is for final products.  
 
# Commons Governance Working Group Report ([http://commons.esipfed.org/node/1447 Governance Document]) - The steering committee established guidance. One outcome was to differntiate the Commons from other ESIP web assets. The Wiki as collaboration space and esipfed.org is front-forward facing website. The Commons is for final products.  
 
#* Core principles: (1) Light weight, so that content areas are managed by experts  (2) Least restrictive licensing (3)  Persistence to access for resources  
 
#* Core principles: (1) Light weight, so that content areas are managed by experts  (2) Least restrictive licensing (3)  Persistence to access for resources  

Revision as of 12:46, April 11, 2013

ESIP Federation Executive Committee, February 14, 2013

Participants: Carol Meyer, Erin Robinson, John Scialdone, Emily Law, Brian Wee, Karl Benedict, Stefan Falke, Chuck Hutchinson, Tamara Ledley

Meeting called to order at 2:10 by Karl Benedict

  1. Welcome and Introductions - Welcome to new members, Brian, Emily, Roberta and Chris
  2. Approval of February minutes -Chuck made a motion to adopt the minutes as drafted. The motion was seconded by Emily Law. Without discussion, the minutes were approved by acclamation.
  3. Commons Governance Working Group Report (Governance Document) - The steering committee established guidance. One outcome was to differntiate the Commons from other ESIP web assets. The Wiki as collaboration space and esipfed.org is front-forward facing website. The Commons is for final products.
    • Core principles: (1) Light weight, so that content areas are managed by experts (2) Least restrictive licensing (3) Persistence to access for resources
    • Steering Committee made up of .... ; Steering committee more like a working group - how does it fit best?
      • Content area editors - identify experts ensure style
      • Content contributors
      • Admin - Operational/Maintenance
      • Users - viewers of content
      • Group modified the steering committee to include a member of C&B
    • Two license - contributed content micro article/meeting sessions/modules - default is cc-by ; option for public domain - don't have authority to assert copyright.
    • Style guide will be developed with content editors. Will also work through workflows for specific content.
    • Motion to adopt as modified - Tamara/ John; No discussion. Without discussion, governace doc was approved by acclamation
  4. Summer Planning & Travel Impacts (Planning Page) - Talked to both NASA and NOAA program managers. We are on the conferencing radars. NOAA numbers will likely be down. The call for sessions went out - we have 12 so far. We have plenary programs in the works. Excom discussed ability to travel.
  5. Revisiting Award Review Criteria - item postponed because Annette was absent to lead.
  6. Committee Reports
    • Partnership - 7 new partners; Set-up time to meet and review.
  7. Other Business - No business

Meeting adjourned - 1:43.