Difference between revisions of "Data Management Training"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Sophisticus (talk | contribs) m |
Sophisticus (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Collaboration Material == | == Collaboration Material == | ||
* [http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Data_Management_Course_Outline ESIP Short Course outline] | * [http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Data_Management_Course_Outline ESIP Short Course outline] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===Ideas for Funding Proposals=== | ||
| + | * Suggestion from Justin Goldstein on 2015-02-27: | ||
| + | :* Pages 208-209 of the [http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/8.1.204/306 paper] (Carlson, J., Johnston, L., Westra, B., & Nichols, M. (2013). Developing an approach for data management education: A report from the Data Information Literacy project. International Journal of Digital Curation, 8(1). 204–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.254) describes how some results are not generalizable due to the small sample size. I'm thinking therefore that a future research project could deal with this problem by leveraging the libraries associated with the 15 Big 10 Institutions (14 schools + the Univ. of Chicago). | ||
Revision as of 13:03, March 3, 2015
Purpose
This wiki page intends to collect the resources and information relevant to Data Management Training in order to document the development effort.
Meeting Notes
- 2015-02-20: Meeting Notes
- 2015-02-02: Meeting Notes
Collaboration Material
Ideas for Funding Proposals
- Suggestion from Justin Goldstein on 2015-02-27:
- Pages 208-209 of the paper (Carlson, J., Johnston, L., Westra, B., & Nichols, M. (2013). Developing an approach for data management education: A report from the Data Information Literacy project. International Journal of Digital Curation, 8(1). 204–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v8i1.254) describes how some results are not generalizable due to the small sample size. I'm thinking therefore that a future research project could deal with this problem by leveraging the libraries associated with the 15 Big 10 Institutions (14 schools + the Univ. of Chicago).
