Difference between revisions of "Community needs"

From Federation of Earth Science Information Partners
Line 1: Line 1:
 
* Data Intercomparison and quality harmonization
 
* Data Intercomparison and quality harmonization
 
* Fit-for-purpose criteria for data quality (e.g., climate change need vs. near-real-time monitoring need)  
 
* Fit-for-purpose criteria for data quality (e.g., climate change need vs. near-real-time monitoring need)  
* Level 3 "Quality" (what’s that?)
 
 
* Presenting data quality to users
 
* Presenting data quality to users
  

Revision as of 09:50, May 1, 2011

  • Data Intercomparison and quality harmonization
  • Fit-for-purpose criteria for data quality (e.g., climate change need vs. near-real-time monitoring need)
  • Presenting data quality to users

Air Quality

  • What does the air quality community need for data quality (i.e., for many different applications, many things people do - monitoring, detecting, EPA legalistic things, etc)? Is it more important to get data measurement down to 5th digit, or more important to get data within 3 hours, most important coverage (space and time), more important to have consistency throughout data, or precise accuracy and measurement for particular date?
  • What are the methodologies used for data quality assessment throughout the communities? For example, people working with ground-based measurement data - surface means different things throughout different communities. Need to hear about the knowledge that already exists in the AQ community.

Precipitation

Aerosols

Sea Surface Temperature

Ocean Color

Land