|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Go back to [http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Air_Quality/Chemistry_Naming_Conventions Forum, Resources and Discussion on CF compliant Atmospheric Chemistry and Aerosol Names]
| |
| | | | |
| − | Go back to [http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php?title=Agreed_Items_of_Discussion_on_Units Recent Items of Discussion on UDUNITS]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ----
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==JGregory: UDUNITS used for CF ==
| |
| − | It doesn't matter to CF what units are used, so long as they are udunits. Any dimensionally equivalent unit can be used for a given standard name. --[[User:JonathanGregory|JonathanGregory]] 16:51, 22 May 2006 (EDT)
| |
| − | ===......RHusar: Units page added to Wiki===
| |
| − | ::This is a good reminder that in addition to updating the CF standard names, we also have to check to make sure that the list of units in [http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/udunits/ UDUNITS] includes the units used to measure chemical/aerosol entities. We should make another wiki page specifically to deal with the units. In fact, that [[Units| units page]] has been added (a placeholder). This page is the discussion attached to the units page. An additional section for units has been added in the main page.--[[User:Rhusar|Rhusar]] 19:27, 22 May 2006 (EDT) <br><br>
| |
| − | ===......CTextor: Units page integrated as a subtopic to name definition===
| |
| − | Given the increasing amount of material I have reintegrated the UNITS page. I think less point on the front page make it easier to use our site. I hope this is fine with you!--[[User:CTextor|CTextor]] 14 June 2006 (EDT)
| |
