Difference between revisions of "Agclimate telecon 2016-05-03"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Reverse engineer an existing CRT Case Study to derive those questions to which the answers form a "basic story" (i.e., this happened, then that happened, ..., oh, but then, ...) | * Reverse engineer an existing CRT Case Study to derive those questions to which the answers form a "basic story" (i.e., this happened, then that happened, ..., oh, but then, ...) | ||
https://toolkit.climate.gov/taking-action/climate-outlooks-increase-farmers-odds-success | https://toolkit.climate.gov/taking-action/climate-outlooks-increase-farmers-odds-success | ||
| + | |||
'''Planning for Chapel Hill''' | '''Planning for Chapel Hill''' | ||
* Planned CRT Workshop (http://commons.esipfed.org/node/9113) | * Planned CRT Workshop (http://commons.esipfed.org/node/9113) | ||
Revision as of 10:44, April 29, 2016
Back to Ag & Climate Workspace
Draft Agenda (Joint with Energy & Climate Work Group)
Following up on CRT Case Studies
- Reverse engineer an existing CRT Case Study to derive those questions to which the answers form a "basic story" (i.e., this happened, then that happened, ..., oh, but then, ...)
https://toolkit.climate.gov/taking-action/climate-outlooks-increase-farmers-odds-success
Planning for Chapel Hill
- Planned CRT Workshop (http://commons.esipfed.org/node/9113)
- Statuses on presenters
- Coordination with "Telling Your Science Story" session (http://commons.esipfed.org/node/9122)
Minutes:
TB UPDATED!!!
Attendees:
Chris Beltz (Student Fellow)
Nancy Hoebelheinrich
Bill Teng
Richard Eckman
Bar Barbieri
