Difference between revisions of "AQ Work Group Telecons"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
** [[GEO Earth Observations in Decision Support RFP|AQ Potential Responses]]
 
** [[GEO Earth Observations in Decision Support RFP|AQ Potential Responses]]
 
** Start of one response: [[Air Quality Information System and GEOSS: India Air Quality and CATHALAC Applications]]
 
** Start of one response: [[Air Quality Information System and GEOSS: India Air Quality and CATHALAC Applications]]
−
Points of Clarification from call:  
+
* Points of Clarification from call:  
 
**# Each GEO proposal should target one particular user so the proposal with IIT Bombay should be seperate from a proposal with CATHALAC. The hope is that by being more specific the project specific needs will be clearer.
 
**# Each GEO proposal should target one particular user so the proposal with IIT Bombay should be seperate from a proposal with CATHALAC. The hope is that by being more specific the project specific needs will be clearer.
 
**# The end result of the proposed work should be that the users walk away with a better decision support system. The IT and educational aspects are good parts of the project, but should be enabling end-users to walk away with better decisions. Proposals shouldn't just promote training or IT.
 
**# The end result of the proposed work should be that the users walk away with a better decision support system. The IT and educational aspects are good parts of the project, but should be enabling end-users to walk away with better decisions. Proposals shouldn't just promote training or IT.

Revision as of 13:50, May 29, 2009

Main ESIP page >> Main AQ Work Group page Previous calls


Note

The ESIP AQ Work Group is currently meeting every other week. These calls alternate with the GEO Architecture Implementation Pilot AQ Working Group's telecons; you can find their telecons here.

May 29 , 2009 Telecon

1:30pm EDT
Phone: 866-489-0573;
Meeting Code: *2279431*

Topics (feel free to add an item to the agenda):

  • GEO Call For Proposals
  • Points of Clarification from call:
      1. Each GEO proposal should target one particular user so the proposal with IIT Bombay should be seperate from a proposal with CATHALAC. The hope is that by being more specific the project specific needs will be clearer.
      2. The end result of the proposed work should be that the users walk away with a better decision support system. The IT and educational aspects are good parts of the project, but should be enabling end-users to walk away with better decisions. Proposals shouldn't just promote training or IT.
      3. Differentiation between Type I - aren't using Earth Observation data and but interested in learning how to use and Type II - currently using Earth obs, but may want to incorporate other types of Earth observations into their work. There aren't clear distinctions between the two and Lawrence thought these could be either type I or II. Type I projects may need more support, financial and expertise. Type II may already have funding, but just need help getting data.
  • ESIP summer meeting, using video conference to include more participants for at least some sections of meeting.
    • Need to spread the word about the virtual participation in the summer ESIP meeting, potential reps from NOAA, NASA, EPA; also maybe EU particpation?
    • Start preparing/collecting content for the AQ sessions
  • ...

Participants:

  • Greg Leptoukh
  • Lawrence Friedl
  • Brand Niemmann
  • David McCabe
  • John White
  • Glynis
  • Ana Prados
  • Rudy Husar
  • Erin Robinson

Previous Calls

Retrieved from "https://wiki.esipfed.org/w/index.php?title=AQ_Work_Group_Telecons&oldid=20652"
GNU Free Documentation License 1.2
Powered by MediaWiki
Powered by Semantic MediaWiki