Difference between revisions of "AIP CFP AQ Responses"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==Further Analysis== | ==Further Analysis== | ||
===EPA=== | ===EPA=== | ||
+ | ====Scenario==== | ||
+ | ====Infrastructure==== | ||
+ | =====Catalogues, Clearinghouse, Metadata===== | ||
+ | =====Data Product Access: service, schema, encoding===== | ||
+ | =====Sensors and Models Access: service, schema, encoding===== | ||
+ | =====Workflow for derived product and alert generation===== | ||
+ | =====Clients===== | ||
+ | =====Test Facility===== | ||
===ESIP AQ Cluster=== | ===ESIP AQ Cluster=== | ||
+ | ====Scenario==== | ||
+ | ====Infrastructure==== | ||
+ | =====Catalogues, Clearinghouse, Metadata===== | ||
+ | =====Data Product Access: service, schema, encoding===== | ||
+ | =====Sensors and Models Access: service, schema, encoding===== | ||
+ | =====Workflow for derived product and alert generation===== | ||
+ | =====Clients===== | ||
+ | =====Test Facility===== | ||
===ICTeEO=== | ===ICTeEO=== | ||
+ | ====Scenario==== | ||
+ | ====Infrastructure==== | ||
+ | =====Catalogues, Clearinghouse, Metadata===== | ||
+ | =====Data Product Access: service, schema, encoding===== | ||
+ | =====Sensors and Models Access: service, schema, encoding===== | ||
+ | =====Workflow for derived product and alert generation===== | ||
+ | =====Clients===== | ||
+ | =====Test Facility===== | ||
===ISPRA=== | ===ISPRA=== | ||
+ | ====Scenario==== | ||
+ | ====Infrastructure==== | ||
+ | =====Catalogues, Clearinghouse, Metadata===== | ||
+ | =====Data Product Access: service, schema, encoding===== | ||
+ | =====Sensors and Models Access: service, schema, encoding===== | ||
+ | =====Workflow for derived product and alert generation===== | ||
+ | =====Clients===== | ||
+ | =====Test Facility===== | ||
===Northrop Grumman=== | ===Northrop Grumman=== | ||
+ | ====Scenario==== | ||
+ | ====Infrastructure==== | ||
+ | =====Catalogues, Clearinghouse, Metadata===== | ||
+ | =====Data Product Access: service, schema, encoding===== | ||
+ | =====Sensors and Models Access: service, schema, encoding===== | ||
+ | =====Workflow for derived product and alert generation===== | ||
+ | =====Clients===== | ||
+ | =====Test Facility===== | ||
===VIEWS=== | ===VIEWS=== | ||
+ | ====Scenario==== | ||
+ | ====Infrastructure==== | ||
+ | =====Catalogues, Clearinghouse, Metadata===== | ||
+ | =====Data Product Access: service, schema, encoding===== | ||
+ | =====Sensors and Models Access: service, schema, encoding===== | ||
+ | =====Workflow for derived product and alert generation===== | ||
+ | =====Clients===== | ||
+ | =====Test Facility===== | ||
===Washington Univ=== | ===Washington Univ=== | ||
+ | ====Scenario==== | ||
+ | ====Infrastructure==== | ||
+ | =====Catalogues, Clearinghouse, Metadata===== | ||
+ | =====Data Product Access: service, schema, encoding===== | ||
+ | =====Sensors and Models Access: service, schema, encoding===== | ||
+ | =====Workflow for derived product and alert generation===== | ||
+ | =====Clients===== | ||
+ | =====Test Facility===== |
Revision as of 05:27, September 16, 2008
Summary from OGC AIP Committee
- Primary responses: EPA, ESIP AQ Cluster, ICT4EO, ISPRA, Northrop Grumman, VIEWS, Washington Univ
- Contributing responses: CIESIN, Compusult, ESA, ESRI, GOES-R and GMU, INCOSE, NASA World Wind, NOAA NCDC GOSIC, NOAA SNAAP
- Topics
- Air Quality and Human Health
- Proposing formation of a GEOSS Air Quality Community of Practice
- Wildland fire example
- AIRNow system proposed with interoperable interfaces
- user-defined areas for selected variables calculated by WPS
- SensorWeb which might apply best to AirQuality if the air sensors
- State of environment, emissions, and human health.
- intercontinental pollutant transport model
- Decision system pattern for AQ
- Global surfaces of population counts, densities, and quality measure of population-weighted mean geographic unit area, at two scales.
- Development of RM-ODP viewpoint descriptions