2016 Winter Meeting Survey
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Revision as of 12:35, February 3, 2016 by Annie Keyes (talk | contribs)
Survey
2016 Winter Meeting Survey PDF
Main Points
- Generally, very positive
- Plenary speakers were well-received
- New science communication interest
- Request for more organized meeting page, gui refresh
- Networking is key -more social/poster session time.
- Room size often too small
- Plenary running overtime
- Powerstrips
- More time for Q&A's, discussions at break-outs.,more non-traditional sessions that are not just people lecturing/presenting.
- App well received
- Larger breakout rooms
- New location was liked
