Difference between revisions of "2016 Winter Meeting Survey"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===Results from the 2016 Winter Meeting Survey===
+
===Survey===
 +
[[Media:Wintermeetingsurvey.pdf | 2016 Winter Meeting Survey PDF]]
  
<gallery>
+
===Main Points===
File:Wintermeetingsurvey.pdf
+
* Generally, very positive
</gallery>
+
* Plenary speakers were well-received
 +
* New science communication interest
 +
* Request for more organized meeting page, gui refresh
 +
* Networking is key -more social/poster session time.  
 +
* Room size often too small
 +
* Plenary running overtime
 +
* Powerstrips
 +
*More time for Q&A's, discussions  at break-outs.,more non-traditional sessions that are not just people lecturing/presenting.
 +
*App well received
 +
*Larger breakout rooms
 +
*New location was liked

Latest revision as of 12:35, February 3, 2016

Survey

2016 Winter Meeting Survey PDF

Main Points

  • Generally, very positive
  • Plenary speakers were well-received
  • New science communication interest
  • Request for more organized meeting page, gui refresh
  • Networking is key -more social/poster session time.
  • Room size often too small
  • Plenary running overtime
  • Powerstrips
  • More time for Q&A's, discussions at break-outs.,more non-traditional sessions that are not just people lecturing/presenting.
  • App well received
  • Larger breakout rooms
  • New location was liked