Spatial and temporal reconciliation to support dataset comparisons

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)

Use Case AQ.Comparisons.1.a

Spatial and temporal reconciliation to support dataset comparisons

Purpose

To process datasets so that they align in spatial and temporal dimensions, thereby facilitating data comparisons. For example, if

Revision Information

Version 0.1.a

Prepared by: Stefan Falke
Washington University and Northrop Grumman IT - TASC

created: May 11, 2007

Revision History

Modified by <Modifier Name/Affil>, <Date/time>, <Brief Description>

Use Case Identification

Use Case Designation

AQ.Comparisons.1.a

Use Case Name

Short name: Dataset comparisons

Long name: Reconciliation of datasets for spatial and temporal comparisons

Use Case Definition

The combination or integration of independent data sources often generates new insight into the characterization and analysis of air pollution. Integrating datasets is often difficult because they are collected or generated a different spatial and temporal resolutions. For example, As web information systems advance beyond data access and visualization of individual datasets, there is a need to develop web services to process datasets to a common spatial and temporal framework. Aligning

Actors

Primary Actors

Air quality analyst who seeks to either directly compare two datasets or who needs to modify a dataset so that it is suitable as input into a data analysis exercise.

Other Actors

Preconditions

  • 1. Datasets are accessible through standard interfaces
  • 2. Dataset format types are known
  • 3. A spatial-temporal framework for the analysis is provided by user.

Postconditions

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.

Normal Flow (Process Model)

  • 1) Define spatial-temporal framework for comparative analysis (e.g., what's the ratio between these two SO2 emissions model outputs over the contiguous U.S. for May 1, 2005?)
  • 2) Data access (independent process for each dataset being compared)
  • 3) Data processing to interpolate/extrapolate to a common space-time framework
  • 4) Data comparison

Alternative Flows

Successful Outcomes

  • 1. Meaningful data comparisons.

Failure Outcomes

  • 1. Misalignment error in spatial-temporal framework among datasets
  • 2.

Special Functional Requirements

None

Extension Points

  • <Cluster>.<SubArea>.<number>.<letter 1>

Diagrams

Use Case Diagram

State Diagram (optional)

Activity Diagram (optional)

Other Diagrams (optional)

Non-Functional Requirements (optional)

Performance

Reliability

Scalability

Usability

Security

Other Non-functional Requirements

Selected Approach

Overall Technical Approach

Architecture

Participating Organizations/Projects

Technology A

Description

Benefits

Limitations

Technology B

Description

Benefits

Limitations

References (optional)