P&S Monthly Mar 16, 2011
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Revision as of 12:27, March 16, 2011 by Ken Keiser (Keiser) (talk | contribs)
Back to: Products and Services
Minutes March 16, 2011 Products and Services Telecon
Participants: Rob Raskin, Ken Keiser, John Scialdone, Tyler Stevens, Yuechen Chi, Resge & Kai Liu (GMU), Phil Yang, Hook Hua, Carol Meyer
<thanks to Carol for taking notes>
Presentation Slides: Media: Telecon-03-16-2011.pdf
- 1. Standing Time for a meeting – 3rd Wednesday at 2 Eastern
- 2. Tyler Stevens agreed to serve as Vice Chair of the Committee
- 3. Review of Committee’s Charter
- a. Is the committee’s charter still relevant? Changes needed?
- i. The bylaws reflect that the committee can/should be reflecting on best practices
- ii. No changes needed
- b. Current Activities:
- i. Expert Skills database
- 1. Stand alone system to link experts skills to organizational database
- 2. Proposed capability – service exchange
- ii. DOI testbed support
- 1. EZId (CA Digital Library)
- iii. Semantic Data & Services Registration
- iv. Application Specific Portal
- 1. Duplicated portal from EIE
- 2. Did a water portal & NASA water/energy cycle portal
- i. Expert Skills database
- c. Future Activities:
- i. Webspace to advertise ESIP (member) products
- ii. Assign quality metrics to ESIP (member) products
- iii. Metadata for describing virtual products and services
- iv. Service exchange bank
- v. Service for data set equivalence (testbed)
- vi. Experts skills database expansion to include connections between ESIPs and how they were facilitated
- 1. Privacy concerns for information
- vii. Expert skills database expansion to allow for people to be associated with multiple member organizations
- a. Is the committee’s charter still relevant? Changes needed?
- 4. Possible Next Steps
- a. Are there procedures for moving things out of the testbed - is that necessary?
- b. Investigate setting a way to host reference implementations of testbed and other functionality that might be useful to members
- i. supports best practices
- c. Need a way to capture user/member feedback before pushing testbed further with other groups
- d. Where should testbed machine reside?
- i. Virtually? At an institution?
- ii. What role does the cloud play?
- 5. Next telecon – review proposal for submission to Ficom