2016 Winter Meeting Survey

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Revision as of 12:35, February 3, 2016 by Annie Keyes (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Survey

2016 Winter Meeting Survey PDF

Main Points

  • Generally, very positive
  • Plenary speakers were well-received
  • New science communication interest
  • Request for more organized meeting page, gui refresh
  • Networking is key -more social/poster session time.
  • Room size often too small
  • Plenary running overtime
  • Powerstrips
  • More time for Q&A's, discussions at break-outs.,more non-traditional sessions that are not just people lecturing/presenting.
  • App well received
  • Larger breakout rooms
  • New location was liked