Difference between revisions of "Sustainable Data Management/20200710 telcon notes"
(→Notes) |
(→Notes) |
||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
Goals: | Goals: | ||
we want to promote funding to address repos angst (who cannot yet meet these guidelines) | we want to promote funding to address repos angst (who cannot yet meet these guidelines) | ||
| + | prioritize some parts (eg, the T of trust, then items within that) | ||
Revision as of 14:02, July 10, 2020
To connect
- Join from computer, tablet or smartphone at: https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/618011013
- Dial in using your phone: :United States: +1 (571) 317-3122
- Access Code: 618-011-013
Agenda
- summary/discussion of the TRUST mini-symposium.
- Hoping some of you have read the TRUST paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-020-0486-7
- Reminder: put this on your sched:
- Aligning data publishing workflows among repositories, publishers, funders, and researches
Attending
- Margaret O'Brien (scribe)
- Shelley Stall
- Megan Carter
- Sophie Hou
- Helen Glaves
- Philip Tarrant
- Ruth Duerr
- Erin Antognoii
Regrets
- Corinna
- Rebecca
Notes
TRUST mini-symp concentric circles. diagram. - Recording here: _____
- repositories focus on implementation, an inner Circle, within Aspirations (TRUST, FAIR, CARE) and certification (CTS, WDS, ISO) - within that, the HOW (rather than the WHAT)
1:32 PMShelley Stall to Everyone
The link to the recording of the TRUST mini symposium: https://www.rdc-drc.ca/activities/webinars/archived-webinars/
1:34 PMShelley Stall to Everyone CARE princples: https://www.gida-global.org/care
1:42 PMShelley Stall to Everyone https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100058
Matrix:
FAIR, CARE, TRUST x
repo how-items
Audience for eventual doc:
- groups aspiring to be repository (or use an existing reps instead of web page-posting) - even individual researchers do this.
- existing repos aspiring to certification
Aspiration (in the TRUST outer circle) are open to interpretation. Our guidelines describe implementation.
Root cause of the web-page-problem: researchers cannot find repositories that meet their needs
in order to fulfills what your communities ask for (fair, trust, core) here is what repo comm has determined are the base capability to take these, and find repos that meet them.
What about the rest of the data life cycle?
Define "repository": ?
Goals: we want to promote funding to address repos angst (who cannot yet meet these guidelines) prioritize some parts (eg, the T of trust, then items within that)
research community become discerning consumers.
Action Items
- add new folks to list serve - mob
- get TRUST mini symp link - mob
- start a spreadsheet to brainstorm on a matrix
