Difference between revisions of "Sustainable Data Management/20200509 telcon notes"

Revision as of 15:03, May 8, 2020

Join from computer, tablet or smartphone at: https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/618011013

Dial in using your phone: :United States: +1 (571) 317-3122
- Access Code: 618-011-013

Goal: summarize our activities to the rest of the Federation, solicit ideas or members.

feedback from data stewardship group: Nice idea, needs some scoping.

Use cases
- Primary: someone suggests starting a new repo. asks: what do I need to do?
- Primary: one of the 300+ domain repos asks, what dos it mean for me to be a repository in this community?
- Secondary: NSF can use this doc to review proposals for repositories.

We would not detail the defining services, products for any repo. Instead, offer a set of common features across all. guidelines for implementation.
can we guide funding-limited repos on what goals they might want to plan for.
differentiate from Core trust seal

TRUST Principles: transparency (T), responsibility (R), user community (U), sustainability (S) and technology (T):

similar to the FAIR principles (ie. high level). began(?) as RDA initiative (Philadelphia, WDS cert)

one approach - organize guidelines around these facets, ask what do repos have to implement to enable that?

possible format:

index? or
checklist?
for x see y
- examples
  - for identifiers: point to a founding doc
  - data access: (our paper on tech interop) also something from NASA. when do you want to use an OGC service, when netcdf.

does Core Trust Seal have any recommendations for implementation? not really, unless you are working on an application.

some suggestions that they tighten requirements, did not happen.

Goal should be: a repository is "CTS, TRUSTed FAIR OAIS"

Others working in this space:

Next things to focus on

- find a place to assemble existing material (docs we would link to). (zotero) Rebecca/Shelley -- Core trust seal material: - start a google folder (margaret) -- adopt shelley's draft: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TIV8Q5-4uBhFhdsA3cPvndKrE2P9ZIKyGJ8XBo22ufk/edit?pli=1#heading=h.xxxz967ga2no -- introductory paras for shelley's draft (RUTH)

Chat log (might have some additional links):

Megan Carter (to All): Nice to meet you, Erin.

1:04 PMErin Antognoli (to All): My email: Erin.Antognoli@usda.gov

1:29 PMPhilip Tarrant (to All): Got to drop off. It was good to see everyone.

1:36 PMShelley Stall (to All): for TRUST

1:42 PMRobert Downs (to All): Yes, that is the right group and the correct white paper

1:49 PMRebecca Koskela (to All): https://datatogether.org/

1:50 PMShelley Stall (to All): https://www.fairsfair.eu

1:53 PMRebecca Koskela (to All): and also this - same name but they don't reference each other

Add https protocol to this: www.rd-alliance.org/system/files/datatogether300.jpg

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 *
-TRUST Principles:  transparency (T), responsibility (R), user community (U), sustainability (S) and technology (T)
+TRUST Principles:  transparency (T), responsibility (R), user community (U), sustainability (S) and technology (T):
 similar to the FAIR principles (ie. high level).
-began(?) as RDA initiative (Philadelphia, WDS cert) - https://www.rd-alliance.org/ig-rdawds-certification-digital-repositories-rda-13th-plenary-meeting-0
+began(?) as RDA initiative (Philadelphia, WDS cert)
-Comment doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pbRw1uf-W-BRMxjj8ZNZJHQTI-ggLjRWq8jiu4Oy6Yc/edit
+* - https://www.rd-alliance.org/ig-rdawds-certification-digital-repositories-rda-13th-plenary-meeting-0
+* Comment doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pbRw1uf-W-BRMxjj8ZNZJHQTI-ggLjRWq8jiu4Oy6Yc/edit
@@ Line 69: / Line 71: @@
 * earth cube CDF -
-- Decide what repos aspects we want to cover, continue scoping
+Next things to focus on
-- Decide on scope: probably earth/env science (not all research)
+* look over available material
+* Decide what repos aspects we want to cover, continue scoping
+* Decide on scope: probably earth/env science (not all research)
 == Action Items:==