Difference between revisions of "Sustainable Data Management/20200509 telcon notes"
(→Notes) |
(→Notes) |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
Bob: paper on the trust principles, high level (no technical details). '''TO DO: URL, please''' | Bob: paper on the trust principles, high level (no technical details). '''TO DO: URL, please''' | ||
| − | transparency, user | + | transparency (T), responsibility (R), user community (U), sustainability (S) and technology (T) |
similar to the FAIR principles. | similar to the FAIR principles. | ||
idea behind it: RDA initiative (Philadelphia, WDS cert) - https://www.rd-alliance.org/ig-rdawds-certification-digital-repositories-rda-13th-plenary-meeting-0 | idea behind it: RDA initiative (Philadelphia, WDS cert) - https://www.rd-alliance.org/ig-rdawds-certification-digital-repositories-rda-13th-plenary-meeting-0 | ||
| + | https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pbRw1uf-W-BRMxjj8ZNZJHQTI-ggLjRWq8jiu4Oy6Yc/edit | ||
| Line 62: | Line 63: | ||
some suggestions that they tighten requirements, did not happen. | some suggestions that they tighten requirements, did not happen. | ||
| + | |||
| + | what you want to be: a "TRUSTed FAIR OAIS" | ||
| + | |||
| + | Action Item: | ||
| + | - assemble existing material (docs we would link to). | ||
| + | -- Core trust seal material: | ||
| + | - Decide what repos aspects we want to cover, organize these? TRUST? are their what aspects under that? | ||
Revision as of 13:43, May 8, 2020
To connect
- Join from computer, tablet or smartphone at: https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/618011013
- Dial in using your phone: :United States: +1 (571) 317-3122
- Access Code: 618-011-013
Agenda
- Review notes and ideas from February
- 3 Slides for ESIP Collaboration Area Highlights
Goal: summarize our activities to the rest of the Federation, solicit ideas or members.
Attending
- Megan Carter
- Erin Antognoii (with NAL, Ag Commons)
- Ruth Duerr
- Corinna Gries
- Shelley Stall
- Rebecca Koskela
- Margaret O'Brien (scribe)
- Bob Downs
- Philip Tarrant
Regrets
- Cyndy Parr
Notes
feedback from data stewardship group:
Nice idea, needs some scoping.
- Use case: someone suggests starting a new repo. asks: what do I need to do?
- use case: one of the 300+ domain repos asks, what dos it mean for me to be a repository in this community?
knowing that there are defining services, products for any repo: it would be useful to have a set of common featues across all. what are they
how are these differentiated from Core trust seal? (not inventing that) can we guide $$-limited repos on what goals they might want to have/
Bob: paper on the trust principles, high level (no technical details). TO DO: URL, please
transparency (T), responsibility (R), user community (U), sustainability (S) and technology (T)
similar to the FAIR principles. idea behind it: RDA initiative (Philadelphia, WDS cert) - https://www.rd-alliance.org/ig-rdawds-certification-digital-repositories-rda-13th-plenary-meeting-0 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pbRw1uf-W-BRMxjj8ZNZJHQTI-ggLjRWq8jiu4Oy6Yc/edit
one approach pick one of these facets (e.t., trust). what do repos have to do to enable that?
what about an index? or checklist? guidelines for implementation
for x see y
identifiers: point to a founding doc
data access: (our paper on tech interop) also something from NASA. when do you want to use an OGC service, when netcdf.
does Core Trust Seal have any recommendations for implementation? not really, unless you are working on an application.
some suggestions that they tighten requirements, did not happen.
what you want to be: a "TRUSTed FAIR OAIS"
Action Item: - assemble existing material (docs we would link to). -- Core trust seal material: - Decide what repos aspects we want to cover, organize these? TRUST? are their what aspects under that?
