Difference between revisions of "Interagency Data Stewardship/LifeCycle/Preservation Forum/TeleconNotes/2017-10-16meetingnotes"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(Created page with "''' Meeting Notes - Data Stewardship Committee - 2017-10-16 2 p.m. EST / 12 p.m. MST / 11 a.m. PT''' * Join the meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone. :* Click: htt...") |
|||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
:* Recruit champions for the idea/concept | :* Recruit champions for the idea/concept | ||
::* Be vocal & advocate (Rich Signell's success with push for a mini-series on interactive reproducible notebooks is a good example) | ::* Be vocal & advocate (Rich Signell's success with push for a mini-series on interactive reproducible notebooks is a good example) | ||
− | * Some questions: | + | * Some questions/comments: |
:* '''Sophie''' asked whether it has been difficult for individuals who want to be champions to get support | :* '''Sophie''' asked whether it has been difficult for individuals who want to be champions to get support | ||
::* '''Leslie''': | ::* '''Leslie''': | ||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
:::* CDI has been working to communicate the value of these efforts up to USGS leadership and managers, in hopes of providing more opportunities for such people | :::* CDI has been working to communicate the value of these efforts up to USGS leadership and managers, in hopes of providing more opportunities for such people | ||
:* '''Matt''' asked about the process used to determine which recommendations were most "actionable"/feasible | :* '''Matt''' asked about the process used to determine which recommendations were most "actionable"/feasible | ||
− | ::* Leslie noted that the decision-making process balances potential impact with feasibility | + | ::* '''Leslie''' noted that the decision-making process balances potential impact with feasibility |
:* '''Bob Downs''' pointed out that potential champions can be those with common goals or similar projects/interests, so that those who do not have the resources to work specifically on advocating a particular project might be able to advocate for the idea/project generally | :* '''Bob Downs''' pointed out that potential champions can be those with common goals or similar projects/interests, so that those who do not have the resources to work specifically on advocating a particular project might be able to advocate for the idea/project generally | ||
Revision as of 13:39, October 16, 2017
Meeting Notes - Data Stewardship Committee - 2017-10-16 2 p.m. EST / 12 p.m. MST / 11 a.m. PT
- Join the meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.
- You can also dial in using your phone.
- United States: +1 (408) 650-3123
- Access Code: 453-694-565
Attendees: Leslie Hsu, Bruce Caron, Heather Brown, Nancy Ritchey, Ruth Duerr, Rama, Matt Mayernik, Sophie Hou, Jamie Collins, Shelley Stall, Denise Hills, Justin Goldstein, Corinna Gries, Bob Downs, Philip Jones
Notes:
1) ESIP Program Committee update / budget request update
2) Quick reminder about nominations for ESIP leadership positions (Sophie H.)
- Nominations for leadership positions are open
- Keep your eye posted on Monday updates, or contact Sophie, or check out the nomination Wiki
- Link to Nomination Wiki: http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Nomination_Committee
- Email address for Nomination Committee: Nominations@esipfed.org
- Positions that are looking for nominations: http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Nomination_Committee/2018_Nominations_and_Ballot
- Link to Nomination Form: https://goo.gl/forms/xDbsAQf1oHfLyeAZ2
3) Bob Downs presented briefly on events at the recent RDA meeting
- Good session on certification of repositories
- Also, a good session on infrastructure (repository platforms for research data)
- Included presentations by several developers
- Bob reported that slides will soon be posted
4) Invited Presentation: Leslie Hsu, USGS Community for Data Integration (CDI)
- Motivating question: How do you keep momentum and carry forward knowledge and ideas generated at a meeting?
- Recent case study: CDI Workshop
- Have workshop every 2 years; last one this May in Denver
- CDI is much like ESIP: Lots of remote presentations/teleconferences; wide range of experience/background in those represented
- USGS manages but Leslie stresses not strictly a USGS organization; anyone can be a member
- Currently active topics (focus areas) include: Data management (data life cycle), tech stack (joint w/ESIP Tech Dive), open source software development, semantic web, bioinformatics, DevOps
- Current info can be found on the CDI Wiki: https://my.usgs.gov/confluence/display/cdi/Home
- At the latest CDI workshop in May:
- Much like an ESIP meeting (sessions are suggested/introduced/chaired by those interested)
- Theme: "Enabling Integrated Science"
- Four areas of focus: Computing Capacity, Modeling, Data & Integration, Science Data Infrastructure
- For each area, asked same questions:
- Where are we now?
- Where to we want to be?
- How do we get there?
- Meeting began with some keynotes, then transitioned to breakouts
- Charge to breakouts: Return with 3-5 specific suggestions or actions that could be taken to fill the gaps in a specific area
- Outcomes:
- Lots of notes and suggestions
- 40-50 separate recommendations; ~ 10 pilot projects proposed
- Everyone did a great job of translating these notes into well-organized reports
- The challenges:
- Figure out which of the many recommendations/suggestions were most feasible, and which will have the greatest impact for USGS
- Determine how best to translate roadmap into action
- Four critical lessons learned from the experience:
- Relate the suggestion back to the USGS CDI organizational framework and goals (a requirement)
- Publish and share a document
- Puts results/suggestions/ideas into the public forum (working on getting DOIs for these documents)
- Link the ideas to funding opportunities and deadlines
- Recruit champions for the idea/concept
- Be vocal & advocate (Rich Signell's success with push for a mini-series on interactive reproducible notebooks is a good example)
- Some questions/comments:
- Sophie asked whether it has been difficult for individuals who want to be champions to get support
- Leslie:
- Some potential champions have a lot more time/bandwidth to devote to side projects; others do not have the concrete resources to do so
- CDI has been working to communicate the value of these efforts up to USGS leadership and managers, in hopes of providing more opportunities for such people
- Matt asked about the process used to determine which recommendations were most "actionable"/feasible
- Leslie noted that the decision-making process balances potential impact with feasibility
- Bob Downs pointed out that potential champions can be those with common goals or similar projects/interests, so that those who do not have the resources to work specifically on advocating a particular project might be able to advocate for the idea/project generally
5) Update from Rama on ISO standard development
- Rama has been working to establish a PCCS standard through ISO
- Effort grew out of earlier efforts at ESIP, NASA, ESA, CEOSS WGISS etc.
- Draft standard has been released as ISO 19165 and Rama proposed extension as 19165-2
- International effort to establish standard will take 3 years
- Rama will be soliciting comments/feedback from the DS cluster once a more formal draft has been developed
6) ESIP winter meeting ideas
- Deadline for session proposals is end of this month
- Matt: Session on data risk factors: How do we identify/categorize risk factors so data managers/users can figure out which might be most applicable for their environment
- Justin may propose a session on data visualization (if he and colleagues are not at AMS, which is happening concurrently)
- Rama reports some possible Information Quality cluster sessions which may be of interest: A follow-up from the summer meeting; progress update for the NASA data quality working group
- Matt asked whether it would be useful to have another cluster business meeting
- Some attendees felt we might only need to have a single business meeting; Bruce thought summer might work best for purposes of the Federal fiscal year