Difference between revisions of "Sustainable Data Management/20160721 ESIP summer mtg"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* Speakers: | * Speakers: | ||
− | * * Bob Downs - intro/Beagrie 2016 - see "Resources" for Beagrie rpt slides: http://commons.esipfed.org/sites/default/files/DownsIntrotoROIdraft20160720.pptx | + | * * Bob Downs - intro/Beagrie 2016 - |
− | * * Anne Wilson - JISC report - see "Resources" slides: http://commons.esipfed.org/sites/default/files/JISC%20report%20out.pdf | + | * * * see "Resources" for Beagrie rpt |
− | * * Ruth Duerr - Lead in to next steps, slides: http://commons.esipfed.org/sites/default/files/ROI-WhyESIPsummer-2016.pdf | + | * * * slides: http://commons.esipfed.org/sites/default/files/DownsIntrotoROIdraft20160720.pptx |
+ | * * Anne Wilson - JISC report - | ||
+ | * * * see "Resources" for full report | ||
+ | * * * slides: http://commons.esipfed.org/sites/default/files/JISC%20report%20out.pdf | ||
+ | * * Ruth Duerr - Lead in to next steps, | ||
+ | * * * slides: http://commons.esipfed.org/sites/default/files/ROI-WhyESIPsummer-2016.pdf | ||
PPTs are at session node: http://commons.esipfed.org/node/9133 | PPTs are at session node: http://commons.esipfed.org/node/9133 |
Revision as of 15:41, July 21, 2016
- Speakers:
- * Bob Downs - intro/Beagrie 2016 -
- * * see "Resources" for Beagrie rpt
- * * slides: http://commons.esipfed.org/sites/default/files/DownsIntrotoROIdraft20160720.pptx
- * Anne Wilson - JISC report -
- * * see "Resources" for full report
- * * slides: http://commons.esipfed.org/sites/default/files/JISC%20report%20out.pdf
- * Ruth Duerr - Lead in to next steps,
- * * slides: http://commons.esipfed.org/sites/default/files/ROI-WhyESIPsummer-2016.pdf
PPTs are at session node: http://commons.esipfed.org/node/9133
Definitions/context: http://cirss.lis.illinois.edu/Documents/Publications_docs/Choudhury_2013a.pdf
- Levels:
- storage
- archiving
- preservation
- curation
- Maturity:
{ref here}
- data services
- data checking
- metadata quality
- migration
Value of repo depends on a combination of their activities, and maturity. e.g.,.
- value should go up with higher levels, but how to quantify is difficult
- NASA L1-L4 levels.
Users: a similar degree of differences between their expectations/needs, and the value they might assign (or could be assigned to them)
Comments:
- when companies do ROI, it is based on cost-to-produce, and they anticipate an amount in return. Ours: it costs $x to produce, and we give it all away. so no value is really known.
- Universities when economic impact for their existence: what methodology do they use?
- studies on NSDES - valuation of satellite data (economist with UCAR) - perhaps NASA has some of these also.
- NASA counts the number of citations that use some data products, but not monetary value (Rama)
- NASA efficiency metrics to OMB (Rama) - getting more efficient every year! budgets are flat, yet output goes up.
- assigning value: some businesses make large sums of $$ on public data. others have no monetary but large socitial value (eg, an sustainability researcher in E. Africa) - at a minimum, could these be cited?
- compare to BEDI project? Big Earth Data Initiative - were there some evaluation metrics?