Difference between revisions of "Telecon 10.28.13 materials"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Carolbmeyer (talk | contribs) m |
Carolbmeyer (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::*how much metadata to preserve | ::*how much metadata to preserve | ||
::*what metadata to preserve | ::*what metadata to preserve | ||
− | ==== | + | |
+ | ====Four Themes==== | ||
:*Culture | :*Culture | ||
::*reactive rather than proactive | ::*reactive rather than proactive | ||
Line 17: | Line 18: | ||
:*Technology Drivers | :*Technology Drivers | ||
::*new technologies create research opportunities | ::*new technologies create research opportunities | ||
− | :*Stewardship | + | :*Stewardship of Scientific Assets |
+ | :*Funding | ||
+ | |||
# finalize plenary panel list via email | # finalize plenary panel list via email |
Revision as of 08:05, October 28, 2013
Participants: Anne Wilson; Bob Downs; Carol Meyer
1. General
- Conversation about who to involve on the panel.
- Jen Schopf as an workshop invitee, to represent the networking infrastructure angle
2. Messaging
- Issues to be underscored - data collection is a temporary activity; data become at risk after collection activities due to lack of explicit support for data stewardship; data generator *might* not have access to their data if its archiving has not been supported; publications fill some of this gap for research results, less on the data
- High Level Questions:
- how much metadata to preserve
- what metadata to preserve
Four Themes
- Culture
- reactive rather than proactive
- need professional development/education to affect culture change
- need incentives = Funding
- Technology Drivers
- new technologies create research opportunities
- Stewardship of Scientific Assets
- Funding
- finalize plenary panel list via email
- articulate our questions - plus, 'what could the study do for your agency' (no slides, instead a conversation)
- draft invitation ** carol to draft invitation
- carol send email regarding structuring the breakout