Difference between revisions of "Discovery Telecon 2011-03-08"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Decide on Voting Method == | == Decide on Voting Method == | ||
− | * What are we voting for? | + | * What are we voting for? |
+ | ** from lat month's minutes, "Also done via Discussion pages, with thread named "Voting"; people can leave their signatures with Yea or Nay" | ||
* anonymous voting? | * anonymous voting? | ||
* Where to vote? | * Where to vote? |
Revision as of 15:01, March 8, 2011
<< Back to the Discovery Telecons page
DCP-1 review
- Review final changes to DCP-1: ESIP Discovery Cast Atom Response Format v1.1
- Answer some questions posted on the DCP-1 Discussions.
- rel links and IANA.
- Does the IANA rel types require a namespace?
- Is a rectangular bbox in the response always required? Even if the 'natural' bounds are a circle or polygon?
- This is a 'baseline' specification of the OpenSearch response. Would need specifics for granule, collection, and service responses.
- Should we specify that all discovery services must support the full GeoRSS-Simple spec? Note the support of box, circle, and polygon types. But radius, line, and point are not in yet.
Decide on Voting Method
- What are we voting for?
- from lat month's minutes, "Also done via Discussion pages, with thread named "Voting"; people can leave their signatures with Yea or Nay"
- anonymous voting?
- Where to vote?
- esipfed.org wiki
- new Drupal-based ESIP Federation website?
- Doodle?
- ...?
Next DCP ideas
- Specific extensions to Discovery Atom Response format for Granule-level, Collection-level, and Service responses. Simply builds upon DCP-1.
- Discovery RSS Response Format?
- OpenSearch Request Format. adopt OGC OpenSearch spec?
- ServiceCasting Request Format?
- DataCasting Request Format?
- Mashup conventions?
ESIP Summer Discovery Session planning
- demos?
- ...
Attendees
- J. McWhirter
- M. Cechini
- C. Lynnes
- C. Tilmes