Difference between revisions of "Metrics"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Carolbmeyer (talk | contribs) |
Carolbmeyer (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
==='''Recommendations:'''=== | ==='''Recommendations:'''=== | ||
+ | :*Carrot/stick approach for committees/working groups (receive funding, must report metrics) | ||
+ | :*Make metrics useful for identifying opportunities, gaps, strategic direction |
Revision as of 19:31, November 5, 2008
Back to Main ESIP page
Back to Implementation Groups
Subgroup Members:
- Rob Raskin
- Peter Fox
Issues to Be Addressed:
- Collaborations - how do we track them? Make these more visible
- Provide a template for committees
- Tie committee/working group funding to metrics reporting
- Are the DSWG interested?
Discussion:
- Air Quality Cluster Metrics
- ESIP Cluster is the point of contact for GEOSS AQ - AQ Community of Practice
- ESIP Cluster had a role in creating EPA Data Summit - Facilitating role; Provided a forum (EPA AQ projects needing to interoperate)
- Did we create a way of working across projects, domains?
- Data Summit has spun off as its own
- Matrix of AQ Systems
- ESIP Wiki in Use to Support Data Summit
- EPA AQ Managers getting connected to IT
- Notion of Metrics Being Ways to Identify New Opportunities
- IT&I Committee
- Workshops
- What Metrics Might come out of this?
- Education Committee
- Relationships gained through ESIP Federation to develop EET Chapters
Recommendations:
- Carrot/stick approach for committees/working groups (receive funding, must report metrics)
- Make metrics useful for identifying opportunities, gaps, strategic direction