Difference between revisions of "SPG Agenda, July 15, 2008"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(Initial page creation - draft agenda)
 
m
Line 22: Line 22:
 
* Discussion with Frank Lindsey – Clarifying the HQ Endorsement Process (4pm-4:30)
 
* Discussion with Frank Lindsey – Clarifying the HQ Endorsement Process (4pm-4:30)
 
** Coordination with NASA Standards Website
 
** Coordination with NASA Standards Website
 +
  
 
* GEOSS SIF with Siri Jodha Khalsa (4:30-5:15pm)
 
* GEOSS SIF with Siri Jodha Khalsa (4:30-5:15pm)

Revision as of 11:53, June 5, 2008

July 15, 2008 NASA ESDSWG SPG meeting – Start time 8:30am

DRAFT AGENDA

Outreach and Connections

  • MEASURES & New Missions - Projects talks (8:30am – 12:00pm with mid morning break)
    • Deborah Smith (for Frank Wentz) – “Distributed Information Services: Climate/Ocean Products for Earth Research (DISCOVER) “
    • Rob Raskin – “SWEET”
    • Brian Beckley (for Richard Ray) – “Integrated Multi-Mission Ocean Altimeter Data for Climate Research”’
    • Karl Benedict – “Time-enabled WMS”
    • Karen Zanter (USGS EROS) – “LDCM Data Processing and Archive Segment”
    • Richard Ullman (GOES-R) – “GOES-R Metadata”


  • Oceans Session (1:30pm – 3:30pm)
    • Ken Casey (NOAA NODC)- “Jason-2/Ocean Surface Topography Mission – Standards Adoption Through Negotiation”
    • Ed Armstrong (NASA JPL) - “Data and Metadata Standards for the GHRSST Project: Present and Future”
    • Ann Ball, IOOS DMAC, “ IOOS DMAC Standards Process and Lessons Learned”


  • Discussion with Frank Lindsey – Clarifying the HQ Endorsement Process (4pm-4:30)
    • Coordination with NASA Standards Website


  • GEOSS SIF with Siri Jodha Khalsa (4:30-5:15pm)
    • What does it mean if a standard shows up in the standards registry?
      • What kind of vetting/review has taken place?
      • Is there proof of at least 2 implementations?
      • Is there info on how widely used (or not widely used) the standard is
    • How does the SIF work with the regional SIFs?
    • Discussion – how should the SPG identify the vetted, widely used standards for potential SPG adoption of the standard?