Difference between revisions of "Module Review Criteria"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Data_Management_Short_Course Back to the main data management training page] | [http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Data_Management_Short_Course Back to the main data management training page] | ||
+ | [http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/AuthorsGuide Back to the Authors Guide page] | ||
When your module is reviewed, here are the criteria the reviewers will be using... | When your module is reviewed, here are the criteria the reviewers will be using... |
Revision as of 08:25, March 8, 2012
Back to the main data management training page Back to the Authors Guide page
When your module is reviewed, here are the criteria the reviewers will be using...
The module should be well-formed (i.e., follow the guidelines above) The content is balanced in that it should be concise, yet simultaneously both accurate and complete The references should be relevant and any URL's should work The content should be geared to a non-expert yet undergraduate or general college level audience The content should be simple and understandable by that audience Jargon and data management terminology (e.g., data set, granule, etc.) needs to be defined or avoided Imagery should be appropriate to the topic and either openly available or appropriately cited