Difference between revisions of "Interagency Data Stewardship/LifeCycle/Jan2011Meeting"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
** Specific questions which might be tackled in these sessions, include: | ** Specific questions which might be tackled in these sessions, include: | ||
*** Which standards/models should be used? | *** Which standards/models should be used? | ||
+ | **** OPM | ||
+ | **** OPMv | ||
+ | **** Provenir | ||
+ | **** ISO Lineage | ||
+ | **** PML 2.1 | ||
+ | **** W3C Provenance vocabulary | ||
*** What testbed activities might help | *** What testbed activities might help | ||
*** What to do about domain specific needs? E.g., vocabularies, etc. | *** What to do about domain specific needs? E.g., vocabularies, etc. |
Revision as of 15:06, November 10, 2010
ESIP 2011 Winter Meeting Plans
Potential Topics
- Provenance
- Curt walk through of FOO examples to illustrate the issues
- Paper session - invite ACCESS, etc. projects to discuss their projects and the issues they are running into
- Session reviewing the existing provenance standards, differences, similarities, gaps, etc.
- Specific questions which might be tackled in these sessions, include:
- Which standards/models should be used?
- OPM
- OPMv
- Provenir
- ISO Lineage
- PML 2.1
- W3C Provenance vocabulary
- What testbed activities might help
- What to do about domain specific needs? E.g., vocabularies, etc.
- Which standards/models should be used?
- Citation guidelines - start developing/reaffirming these
- Data quality and relation to value of data (Bruce)
- Identifiers - Identify the next set of identifier issues to work on. For example, in the first go around we've only considered data sets as a whole and individual items (granules) within a data set. What other things need identifiers?
Must do
- Business meeting
- Cluster chairmanship
- Workplan for upcoming year