Difference between revisions of "Summer 2010 Meeting"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Carolbmeyer (talk | contribs) m |
Carolbmeyer (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
1. Winter Meeting Debrief | 1. Winter Meeting Debrief | ||
| − | :*"positive dilemma" of too little space to accommodate our audience (new venue needed) | + | Survey Results: |
| + | :*"positive dilemma" of too little space to accommodate our audience (new venue needed); larger area for poster session; breakout rooms need to be larger | ||
:*content of sessions were rated as Excellent to Good | :*content of sessions were rated as Excellent to Good | ||
:*liked food, service, staff | :*liked food, service, staff | ||
| + | :*attendees got things done at the meeting through networking and project follow up opportunities | ||
| + | :*attendees really liked the speakers | ||
Revision as of 12:01, January 22, 2010
Visioneers Telecon January 22, 2010
Notes
Participants: Jim Frew, Bruce Caron, Thomas Huang, Mohan Ramamurthy, Tyler Stevens, Karl Benedict, Ana Prados, Chris Lenhardt, Brian Rogan, Carol Meyer
Bruce Caron welcomed the participants and noted the purpose of the Visioneers Group was to allow for open input into the ESIP Federation meeting and to continuously improve them.
1. Winter Meeting Debrief
Survey Results:
- "positive dilemma" of too little space to accommodate our audience (new venue needed); larger area for poster session; breakout rooms need to be larger
- content of sessions were rated as Excellent to Good
- liked food, service, staff
- attendees got things done at the meeting through networking and project follow up opportunities
- attendees really liked the speakers
