Difference between revisions of "Sustainable Data Management/20180914 telcon notes"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(→Notes) |
(→Notes) |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Attending== | ==Attending== | ||
+ | cyndy, phil, bob, shelley, margaret | ||
==Regrets== | ==Regrets== | ||
+ | Ruth | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
summarizing gtm chat: | summarizing gtm chat: | ||
− | + | # since first version was an essay, the background and disc are mixed. need to be split out into what is background (citable) and what is our work (results) | |
+ | # dataset will need revision (no problem) | ||
+ | ##Margaret/Corinna action item | ||
+ | ##note: CP thinks there might be a bit missing, see yellow highlight on costs-summary. | ||
+ | # results table is now is two tables, | ||
+ | ##summary responses for metrics for measuring cost, | ||
+ | ##summary - measuring value added | ||
+ | ###new tables: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sp5QMsTda3ez-FvwNEQKWjBbHzIc0RzrMZ7jrOYhUuA/edit#gid=1892881214 | ||
+ | # potential discussion points: some metrics fall easily into one level-of-implementation box. some do not. Ones that dont are for a variety of reasons. | ||
+ | # some of our metrics are indicators that are not inherently in $$. some are just impact metrics. may need to make the point that we started from a financial ROI. need to find the right language for that. | ||
+ | ## action item: revisit beagrie - they went beyond fiancial benefits. see what language they used. | ||
+ | # title: might want a different title. | ||
+ | # Reception: | ||
+ | ##CP already using this for all of USDA | ||
+ | ##from shelley: The recommended metrics and measurements that inform the community on performance and value of scientific repositories | ||
+ | ###Shelley, fresh from CDF. Danie will introduce them to the FAIR inventory that ___ and Michael Witt put together. also core trust seal (ref Rebecca K). | ||
+ | ###RK will walk core seal folk thru, in a series of recorded webinars. before Feb, but no deadlines for core seal-ites | ||
+ | #another reference | ||
+ | ##https://www.projectcounter.org/code-of-practice-rd-sections/foreword/ | ||
+ | # Schedule: | ||
+ | ## Phil - methods, intro (will do soonish) | ||
+ | ## Bob - has time in the next few weeks - mostly discussion/intro, | ||
+ | ## Margaret/Cyndy/Corinna - October | ||
− | + | * Next call: October 12 | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Next call: October 12 | ||
==Action Items== | ==Action Items== |
Latest revision as of 15:49, September 14, 2018
To connect
- Join from computer, tablet or smartphone at: https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/618011013
- Dial in using your phone: :United States: +1 (571) 317-3122
- Access Code: 618-011-013
Agenda
- ROI Paper
Attending
cyndy, phil, bob, shelley, margaret
Regrets
Ruth
Notes
- ROI Paper
summarizing gtm chat:
- since first version was an essay, the background and disc are mixed. need to be split out into what is background (citable) and what is our work (results)
- dataset will need revision (no problem)
- Margaret/Corinna action item
- note: CP thinks there might be a bit missing, see yellow highlight on costs-summary.
- results table is now is two tables,
- summary responses for metrics for measuring cost,
- summary - measuring value added
- potential discussion points: some metrics fall easily into one level-of-implementation box. some do not. Ones that dont are for a variety of reasons.
- some of our metrics are indicators that are not inherently in $$. some are just impact metrics. may need to make the point that we started from a financial ROI. need to find the right language for that.
- action item: revisit beagrie - they went beyond fiancial benefits. see what language they used.
- title: might want a different title.
- Reception:
- CP already using this for all of USDA
- from shelley: The recommended metrics and measurements that inform the community on performance and value of scientific repositories
- Shelley, fresh from CDF. Danie will introduce them to the FAIR inventory that ___ and Michael Witt put together. also core trust seal (ref Rebecca K).
- RK will walk core seal folk thru, in a series of recorded webinars. before Feb, but no deadlines for core seal-ites
- another reference
- Schedule:
- Phil - methods, intro (will do soonish)
- Bob - has time in the next few weeks - mostly discussion/intro,
- Margaret/Cyndy/Corinna - October
- Next call: October 12