Difference between revisions of "Telecon 10.28.13 materials"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Carolbmeyer (talk | contribs) m |
Carolbmeyer (talk | contribs) m (→Four Themes) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
2. Messaging | 2. Messaging | ||
− | :Issues to be underscored - data collection is a temporary activity; data become at risk after collection activities due to lack of explicit support for data stewardship; data generator *might* not have access to their data if its archiving has not been supported; publications fill some of this gap for research results, less on the data | + | :*Issues to be underscored - data collection is a temporary activity; data become at risk after collection activities due to lack of explicit support for data stewardship; data generator *might* not have access to their data if its archiving has not been supported; publications fill some of this gap for research results, less on the data |
+ | :*High Level Questions: | ||
+ | ::*how much metadata to preserve | ||
+ | ::*what metadata to preserve | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Four Themes==== | ||
+ | Need to say why this is important - why we should care; answer the so what question<br> | ||
+ | :*Culture | ||
+ | ::*reactive rather than proactive - needs to be forward looking | ||
+ | ::*need professional development/education to affect culture change | ||
+ | ::*need incentives = Funding | ||
+ | :*Technology Drivers | ||
+ | ::*new technologies create research opportunities | ||
+ | ::*new technologies potentially change current stewardship paradigm | ||
+ | :*Stewardship of Scientific Assets | ||
+ | ::*metadata issues | ||
+ | ::*what gets saved & how? | ||
+ | ::*what can be re-generated rather than saved? | ||
+ | :*Funding | ||
+ | ::*ROI | ||
+ | |||
+ | :*What are the examples of game changers; what are the driving forces? | ||
+ | |||
+ | #Carol to reach out to Andrew Turner, Esri for workshop participation | ||
+ | #Everyone to read Eos piece and help with messaging | ||
# finalize plenary panel list via email | # finalize plenary panel list via email |
Latest revision as of 08:35, October 28, 2013
Participants: Anne Wilson; Bob Downs; Carol Meyer
1. General
- Conversation about who to involve on the panel.
- Jen Schopf as an workshop invitee, to represent the networking infrastructure angle
2. Messaging
- Issues to be underscored - data collection is a temporary activity; data become at risk after collection activities due to lack of explicit support for data stewardship; data generator *might* not have access to their data if its archiving has not been supported; publications fill some of this gap for research results, less on the data
- High Level Questions:
- how much metadata to preserve
- what metadata to preserve
Four Themes
Need to say why this is important - why we should care; answer the so what question
- Culture
- reactive rather than proactive - needs to be forward looking
- need professional development/education to affect culture change
- need incentives = Funding
- Technology Drivers
- new technologies create research opportunities
- new technologies potentially change current stewardship paradigm
- Stewardship of Scientific Assets
- metadata issues
- what gets saved & how?
- what can be re-generated rather than saved?
- Funding
- ROI
- What are the examples of game changers; what are the driving forces?
- Carol to reach out to Andrew Turner, Esri for workshop participation
- Everyone to read Eos piece and help with messaging
- finalize plenary panel list via email
- articulate our questions - plus, 'what could the study do for your agency' (no slides, instead a conversation)
- draft invitation ** carol to draft invitation
- carol send email regarding structuring the breakout