Difference between revisions of "Moving Forward on the Earth Science Collaboratory-Details"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
= Agenda = | = Agenda = | ||
== Programmatic == | == Programmatic == | ||
− | |||
− | |||
* NSF EarthCube | * NSF EarthCube | ||
** How are the ESIP ESC and NSF EarthCube efforts similar and different? | ** How are the ESIP ESC and NSF EarthCube efforts similar and different? | ||
+ | * NASA Computational Modeling and Cyberinfrastructure (CMAC) selections | ||
+ | ** Any newly funded collaboratory efforts? | ||
+ | * ESC Roadmap? | ||
+ | ** Let's define on some ball-park goals so we (the community) know where ESC is going | ||
+ | ** Near-term goals | ||
+ | ** Long-term goals | ||
== Technical (Hook and Emily) == | == Technical (Hook and Emily) == | ||
+ | * [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1EY1FZEiyA_Yzd__M-WDnYpLFj4atrU1WChCRl59cV2Y/edit#slide=id.p Presentation] | ||
+ | * Take home messages from recent technical activities at NSF EarthCube | ||
+ | ** Discovery | ||
+ | ** Data | ||
+ | ** Semantics | ||
+ | ** Interoperability | ||
+ | ** Workflow | ||
+ | ** (no dedicated focus on) preservation & stewardship | ||
* Brokering | * Brokering | ||
** Planning for role of brokering in ESC | ** Planning for role of brokering in ESC | ||
Line 17: | Line 28: | ||
** We are hosting a dedicated session to try out one collaboration framework (RAMADDA). | ** We are hosting a dedicated session to try out one collaboration framework (RAMADDA). | ||
** Friday morning's session [http://commons.esipfed.org/node/489 Earth Science Collaboratory Hackathon] | ** Friday morning's session [http://commons.esipfed.org/node/489 Earth Science Collaboratory Hackathon] | ||
+ | *** What do we want to get out of the session? | ||
* HubZero update | * HubZero update | ||
− | ** Planning to hold webex presentation in August. | + | ** Planning to hold webex presentation about [http://hubzero.org/ HubZero: A Platform for Scientific Collaboration] in August. |
** Pending interest, we can explore, compare, and assess HubZero for Earth Science needs. | ** Pending interest, we can explore, compare, and assess HubZero for Earth Science needs. | ||
Line 24: | Line 36: | ||
== Human Factors (Lynnes) == | == Human Factors (Lynnes) == | ||
− | * | + | * The Ecosystem model of data and information systems: the only way to grow an Earth Cube / Earth Science Collaboratory ? |
Latest revision as of 12:35, July 19, 2012
Agenda
Programmatic
- NSF EarthCube
- How are the ESIP ESC and NSF EarthCube efforts similar and different?
- NASA Computational Modeling and Cyberinfrastructure (CMAC) selections
- Any newly funded collaboratory efforts?
- ESC Roadmap?
- Let's define on some ball-park goals so we (the community) know where ESC is going
- Near-term goals
- Long-term goals
Technical (Hook and Emily)
- Presentation
- Take home messages from recent technical activities at NSF EarthCube
- Discovery
- Data
- Semantics
- Interoperability
- Workflow
- (no dedicated focus on) preservation & stewardship
- Brokering
- Planning for role of brokering in ESC
- Alignment with NSF EarthCube Brokering efforts? see Thursday morning's session on EarthCube - Brokering: A Way Forward for Global Multi-disciplinary Data Sharing
- RAMADDA hackathon
- We are hosting a dedicated session to try out one collaboration framework (RAMADDA).
- Friday morning's session Earth Science Collaboratory Hackathon
- What do we want to get out of the session?
- HubZero update
- Planning to hold webex presentation about HubZero: A Platform for Scientific Collaboration in August.
- Pending interest, we can explore, compare, and assess HubZero for Earth Science needs.
User Stories (Kuo and Wee)
Human Factors (Lynnes)
- The Ecosystem model of data and information systems: the only way to grow an Earth Cube / Earth Science Collaboratory ?