Difference between revisions of "2012 Business Meeting"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(Created page with " # Call to Order and Review of Rules of Procedure - Call to order 11:00 am. 41 members present. Please review Robert's Rules #Announcement of El...") |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | # Call to Order and [[Robert%27s_Rules_Cheat_Sheet| Review of Rules of Procedure]] - Call to order 11:00 am. 41 members present (39 in person, 2 via webex). Please review Robert's Rules | |
− | # Call to Order and [[Robert%27s_Rules_Cheat_Sheet| Review of Rules of Procedure]] - Call to order 11:00 am. 41 members present. Please review Robert's Rules | ||
#Announcement of Election Results | #Announcement of Election Results | ||
## Pres - Karl Benedict | ## Pres - Karl Benedict | ||
## VP - Annette Schloss | ## VP - Annette Schloss | ||
## CB - Rob Raskin | ## CB - Rob Raskin | ||
− | ## Finance - | + | ## Finance - Chuck Hutchinson |
## Partnership - John Scialdone | ## Partnership - John Scialdone | ||
## Education - Becky Reid | ## Education - Becky Reid | ||
Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
## Products & Services - Ken Keiser | ## Products & Services - Ken Keiser | ||
## 7 New Partners - Thanks to new members for joining. We are looking forward to working with you. | ## 7 New Partners - Thanks to new members for joining. We are looking forward to working with you. | ||
− | # ESIP Type Caucuses | + | # ESIP Type Caucuses Type I ( ) Type II ( ) Type III (Stefan, Bill Teng, Dave Jones, Liping Di) |
#[http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/2012_Proposed_Bylaw_Changes Discussion and Vote on Proposed Bylaw Changes] | #[http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/2012_Proposed_Bylaw_Changes Discussion and Vote on Proposed Bylaw Changes] | ||
− | # [http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Interagency_Data_Stewardship/Principles Discussion and Vote on Proposed ESIP Data Sharing Principles] | + | ## New Type III definition proposed. Definition was proposed last year, discussion was had, comments were made and the definition was revised. No discussion. Chuck motioned/Karl Seconded |
− | + | ## Discussion Motion to amend: 2/3 approval of the assembly (Steve Kempler second); Voice vote - vote passed | |
− | + | ### Amended language. DC 2 | |
− | + | ## New committee formed. - Frew moved to ammend Data Lifecycle Committee; (withdraw amendment) | |
− | + | ### Tamara Moved/Mark seconded. Chris - Call to Question/ Chuck - 2nd - amendment passes | |
− | + | ### Mark - b. through it's life-cycle; Ken doesn't like data life-cycle (may not want to imply an end) Steve Barrick does think life-cycle is ok. Annette - doesn't want to add. Bruce - Give charge to committee on their view of data lifecycle. Chris calls vote/Jeff - amendment fails. Tamara - calls to question | |
− | + | # [http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Interagency_Data_Stewardship/Principles Discussion and Vote on Proposed ESIP Data Sharing Principles] - passed. | |
− | + | ## - Discussion | |
+ | ## Frew moved charged/endorse the maintenance of these recommended practice docs and keeping them up to date for the Federation. Tamara 2nd. Chuck call to question/Karl 2nd. Amendment passes | ||
+ | ## Frew moved to approve recommended data stewarship and citation documents. 2nd Mark P. ( | ||
+ | ### Discussion - Annette doesn't say much about commercial providers - is it unnecessarily restrictive?; Ruth - wouldn't want to add about commerical. encourages free/at-cost subset. | ||
+ | ### Any provision if conflict between home institution - yes; superseded by legal; nothing wrong with ESIP having an opinion. | ||
+ | ### ESIP Should be putting out these statements/People have to deal - comply w/ESIP guidelines. Benefit of having such a doc outweighs. | ||
+ | ### Call to question/2nd - 1 nay. | ||
+ | ### 1- Nay | ||
+ | # [http://bit.ly/data_citation Discussion and Vote on ESIP Data Citation Guidelines] (bundled) | ||
+ | # Other Business | ||
+ | ## Mark Nominates Curt Tilmes/2nd - ?? Curt new Data Committee | ||
+ | ## Bylaws need to be renumbered sub-point 4/5. Chris moved/Margaret 2nd; No debate; | ||
+ | # Tamara Move to adjourned 12:30! |
Latest revision as of 11:30, January 5, 2012
- Call to Order and Review of Rules of Procedure - Call to order 11:00 am. 41 members present (39 in person, 2 via webex). Please review Robert's Rules
- Announcement of Election Results
- Pres - Karl Benedict
- VP - Annette Schloss
- CB - Rob Raskin
- Finance - Chuck Hutchinson
- Partnership - John Scialdone
- Education - Becky Reid
- IT&I - Matt Austin
- Products & Services - Ken Keiser
- 7 New Partners - Thanks to new members for joining. We are looking forward to working with you.
- ESIP Type Caucuses Type I ( ) Type II ( ) Type III (Stefan, Bill Teng, Dave Jones, Liping Di)
- Discussion and Vote on Proposed Bylaw Changes
- New Type III definition proposed. Definition was proposed last year, discussion was had, comments were made and the definition was revised. No discussion. Chuck motioned/Karl Seconded
- Discussion Motion to amend: 2/3 approval of the assembly (Steve Kempler second); Voice vote - vote passed
- Amended language. DC 2
- New committee formed. - Frew moved to ammend Data Lifecycle Committee; (withdraw amendment)
- Tamara Moved/Mark seconded. Chris - Call to Question/ Chuck - 2nd - amendment passes
- Mark - b. through it's life-cycle; Ken doesn't like data life-cycle (may not want to imply an end) Steve Barrick does think life-cycle is ok. Annette - doesn't want to add. Bruce - Give charge to committee on their view of data lifecycle. Chris calls vote/Jeff - amendment fails. Tamara - calls to question
- Discussion and Vote on Proposed ESIP Data Sharing Principles - passed.
- - Discussion
- Frew moved charged/endorse the maintenance of these recommended practice docs and keeping them up to date for the Federation. Tamara 2nd. Chuck call to question/Karl 2nd. Amendment passes
- Frew moved to approve recommended data stewarship and citation documents. 2nd Mark P. (
- Discussion - Annette doesn't say much about commercial providers - is it unnecessarily restrictive?; Ruth - wouldn't want to add about commerical. encourages free/at-cost subset.
- Any provision if conflict between home institution - yes; superseded by legal; nothing wrong with ESIP having an opinion.
- ESIP Should be putting out these statements/People have to deal - comply w/ESIP guidelines. Benefit of having such a doc outweighs.
- Call to question/2nd - 1 nay.
- 1- Nay
- Discussion and Vote on ESIP Data Citation Guidelines (bundled)
- Other Business
- Mark Nominates Curt Tilmes/2nd - ?? Curt new Data Committee
- Bylaws need to be renumbered sub-point 4/5. Chris moved/Margaret 2nd; No debate;
- Tamara Move to adjourned 12:30!