Difference between revisions of "Virtual Presence"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Carolbmeyer (talk | contribs) |
Carolbmeyer (talk | contribs) |
||
(30 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* Issues related to how we engage people; transparency; communication | * Issues related to how we engage people; transparency; communication | ||
:*At all levels – Federation level – cluster/activity level | :*At all levels – Federation level – cluster/activity level | ||
− | :*How does ESIP operate? | + | ''':*How does ESIP operate?''' |
:*Pathways to participation – need description of who we are; what we do; where you might fit | :*Pathways to participation – need description of who we are; what we do; where you might fit | ||
:*Orientations for new members – liaison with new members | :*Orientations for new members – liaison with new members | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:*must be able to articulate member benefits | :*must be able to articulate member benefits | ||
:*clusters/working groups need to meet partner needs | :*clusters/working groups need to meet partner needs | ||
+ | :*wiki enabled sharing information/collaboration - met a need that was previously done by file sharing, in-person meetings, telecons, listservs - now using all together to engage many people | ||
+ | :*AQ Cluster has used wiki extensively; in addition, now AQ AIP using Google Sites | ||
+ | :*stay open to embracing new technologies as they evolve | ||
+ | :*ESIP breaks down competitive barriers; okay to collaborate | ||
+ | *The Wiki Is Good for... | ||
+ | :*Archival function | ||
+ | :*Anyone can edit/add | ||
+ | :*Information delivery - dyanmic content (near real-time; shared content) | ||
+ | :*Coordination & Collaboration | ||
+ | *Wiki Limitations | ||
+ | :*Not a good entry point into cluster activities/ESIP Federation at this point (other technologies can deal with this better) | ||
+ | :*Need a top level entry point | ||
+ | *Orientation for New Members | ||
+ | :*what is ESIP? (collaboration, value, grassroots) | ||
+ | :*how can I get involved? | ||
+ | :*how can I start a new group? | ||
+ | :*convey how we use virtual means/technologies to carry on business | ||
+ | :*role of Partnership? - need to connect with new Partners | ||
+ | :*role of Type Reps? | ||
+ | :*role of Committee Chairs? | ||
+ | :*examples of things ESIP has done (all levels - ESIP, committees, technical, clusters, wgs, policy, state of activity) | ||
+ | :*stories/metrics | ||
+ | :*sum of the parts is greater than the whole (this idea needs to be better developed; what value does ESIP add?) | ||
+ | :*collaboration across sectors, domains, technologies is value add that the ESIP Federation provides (AQ GEOSS as one example of success & the evenutal creation of an AQ Community of Practice) | ||
+ | :*leveraging resources | ||
+ | *We are really talking about internal engagment | ||
+ | :*technologies are enablers, not the reason we exist | ||
+ | :*our role is to provide value to our sponsors, benefits to our members | ||
+ | *What might replace the Community Engagement Committee? | ||
+ | :*Collaboration metrics committee? | ||
+ | :*Collect our own metrics - outcome/output based? | ||
+ | :*How to capture *new* metrics? - collaboration; multi-agency | ||
+ | :*Wiki provides paper trail of collaborations | ||
+ | :*Okay to talk about anecdotes | ||
+ | *ESIP as an incubator | ||
+ | :*ideas seeded in ESIP Federation - they might mature elsewhere | ||
+ | :*filling gaps; being at the cutting edge | ||
+ | :*sharing of technology - openess | ||
+ | *What needs to be done to improve ESIP's virtual presence | ||
+ | :*for conducting its business | ||
+ | :*for communicating with external audiences | ||
==='''Recommendations:'''=== | ==='''Recommendations:'''=== | ||
+ | *Not really talking about technology - this section needs to be about how the ESIP Federation operates |
Latest revision as of 20:36, November 5, 2008
Back to Main ESIP page
Back to Implementation Groups
Subgroup Members:
- Stefan Falke
- Rob Raskin
- Peter Fox
Issues to Be Addressed:
- Issues related to how we engage people; transparency; communication
- At all levels – Federation level – cluster/activity level
:*How does ESIP operate?
- Pathways to participation – need description of who we are; what we do; where you might fit
- Orientations for new members – liaison with new members
- Community Engagement Committee
- Partnership Committee – follow through
Discussion:
- Motivate people to get involved; get partners to want to participate - technology is not the limiting factor
- must be able to articulate member benefits
- clusters/working groups need to meet partner needs
- wiki enabled sharing information/collaboration - met a need that was previously done by file sharing, in-person meetings, telecons, listservs - now using all together to engage many people
- AQ Cluster has used wiki extensively; in addition, now AQ AIP using Google Sites
- stay open to embracing new technologies as they evolve
- ESIP breaks down competitive barriers; okay to collaborate
- The Wiki Is Good for...
- Archival function
- Anyone can edit/add
- Information delivery - dyanmic content (near real-time; shared content)
- Coordination & Collaboration
- Wiki Limitations
- Not a good entry point into cluster activities/ESIP Federation at this point (other technologies can deal with this better)
- Need a top level entry point
- Orientation for New Members
- what is ESIP? (collaboration, value, grassroots)
- how can I get involved?
- how can I start a new group?
- convey how we use virtual means/technologies to carry on business
- role of Partnership? - need to connect with new Partners
- role of Type Reps?
- role of Committee Chairs?
- examples of things ESIP has done (all levels - ESIP, committees, technical, clusters, wgs, policy, state of activity)
- stories/metrics
- sum of the parts is greater than the whole (this idea needs to be better developed; what value does ESIP add?)
- collaboration across sectors, domains, technologies is value add that the ESIP Federation provides (AQ GEOSS as one example of success & the evenutal creation of an AQ Community of Practice)
- leveraging resources
- We are really talking about internal engagment
- technologies are enablers, not the reason we exist
- our role is to provide value to our sponsors, benefits to our members
- What might replace the Community Engagement Committee?
- Collaboration metrics committee?
- Collect our own metrics - outcome/output based?
- How to capture *new* metrics? - collaboration; multi-agency
- Wiki provides paper trail of collaborations
- Okay to talk about anecdotes
- ESIP as an incubator
- ideas seeded in ESIP Federation - they might mature elsewhere
- filling gaps; being at the cutting edge
- sharing of technology - openess
- What needs to be done to improve ESIP's virtual presence
- for conducting its business
- for communicating with external audiences
Recommendations:
- Not really talking about technology - this section needs to be about how the ESIP Federation operates