Difference between revisions of "SPG Agenda, July 15, 2008"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Allan Doyle (talk | contribs) m |
Allan Doyle (talk | contribs) m (Mostly editorial tweaks & clarifications) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | July 15, 2008 [http://www.esdswg.net/spg NASA ESDSWG SPG] meeting – | + | July 15, 2008 [http://www.esdswg.net/spg NASA ESDSWG SPG] meeting – |
− | + | 8:30am - 5:15pm | |
+ | |||
+ | AGENDA | ||
'''Outreach and Connections''' | '''Outreach and Connections''' | ||
− | * MEASURES & New Missions - Projects talks (8: | + | * Introduction & Background - Richard Ullman (8:30am) |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | * MEASURES & New Missions - Projects talks (8:45am – 12:00pm with mid morning break) | ||
** Deborah Smith (for Frank Wentz) – “Distributed Information Services: Climate/Ocean Products for Earth Research (DISCOVER) “ | ** Deborah Smith (for Frank Wentz) – “Distributed Information Services: Climate/Ocean Products for Earth Research (DISCOVER) “ | ||
** Rob Raskin – “SWEET” | ** Rob Raskin – “SWEET” | ||
** Brian Beckley (for Richard Ray) – “Integrated Multi-Mission Ocean Altimeter Data for Climate Research”’ | ** Brian Beckley (for Richard Ray) – “Integrated Multi-Mission Ocean Altimeter Data for Climate Research”’ | ||
** Karl Benedict – “Time-enabled WMS” | ** Karl Benedict – “Time-enabled WMS” | ||
− | ** Karen Zanter (USGS EROS) – “LDCM Data Processing and Archive Segment” | + | ** Karen Zanter & Brian Sauer (USGS EROS) – “LDCM Data Processing and Archive Segment” |
** Richard Ullman (GOES-R) – “GOES-R Metadata” | ** Richard Ullman (GOES-R) – “GOES-R Metadata” | ||
Line 17: | Line 22: | ||
** Ken Casey (NOAA NODC)- “Jason-2/Ocean Surface Topography Mission – Standards Adoption Through Negotiation” | ** Ken Casey (NOAA NODC)- “Jason-2/Ocean Surface Topography Mission – Standards Adoption Through Negotiation” | ||
** Ed Armstrong (NASA JPL) - “Data and Metadata Standards for the GHRSST Project: Present and Future” | ** Ed Armstrong (NASA JPL) - “Data and Metadata Standards for the GHRSST Project: Present and Future” | ||
− | ** Ann Ball, IOOS DMAC | + | ** Ann Ball, IOOS DMAC - “ IOOS DMAC Standards Process and Lessons Learned” |
− | * Discussion with Frank Lindsey – Clarifying the HQ Endorsement Process (4pm-4: | + | * Discussion with Frank Lindsey – Clarifying the HQ Endorsement Process (4pm-4:30pm) |
** Coordination with NASA Standards Website | ** Coordination with NASA Standards Website | ||
Line 30: | Line 35: | ||
*** Is there info on how widely used (or not widely used) the standard is | *** Is there info on how widely used (or not widely used) the standard is | ||
** How does the SIF work with the regional SIFs? | ** How does the SIF work with the regional SIFs? | ||
− | + | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Discussion – how should the SPG identify vetted, widely used standards for potential SPG adoption? |
Latest revision as of 11:18, June 10, 2008
July 15, 2008 NASA ESDSWG SPG meeting –
8:30am - 5:15pm
AGENDA
Outreach and Connections
- Introduction & Background - Richard Ullman (8:30am)
- MEASURES & New Missions - Projects talks (8:45am – 12:00pm with mid morning break)
- Deborah Smith (for Frank Wentz) – “Distributed Information Services: Climate/Ocean Products for Earth Research (DISCOVER) “
- Rob Raskin – “SWEET”
- Brian Beckley (for Richard Ray) – “Integrated Multi-Mission Ocean Altimeter Data for Climate Research”’
- Karl Benedict – “Time-enabled WMS”
- Karen Zanter & Brian Sauer (USGS EROS) – “LDCM Data Processing and Archive Segment”
- Richard Ullman (GOES-R) – “GOES-R Metadata”
- Oceans Session (1:30pm – 3:30pm)
- Ken Casey (NOAA NODC)- “Jason-2/Ocean Surface Topography Mission – Standards Adoption Through Negotiation”
- Ed Armstrong (NASA JPL) - “Data and Metadata Standards for the GHRSST Project: Present and Future”
- Ann Ball, IOOS DMAC - “ IOOS DMAC Standards Process and Lessons Learned”
- Discussion with Frank Lindsey – Clarifying the HQ Endorsement Process (4pm-4:30pm)
- Coordination with NASA Standards Website
- GEOSS SIF with Siri Jodha Khalsa (4:30-5:15pm)
- What does it mean if a standard shows up in the standards registry?
- What kind of vetting/review has taken place?
- Is there proof of at least 2 implementations?
- Is there info on how widely used (or not widely used) the standard is
- How does the SIF work with the regional SIFs?
- What does it mean if a standard shows up in the standards registry?
- Discussion – how should the SPG identify vetted, widely used standards for potential SPG adoption?