Difference between revisions of "Next Steps"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(New page: Mapping Next Steps An assessment of what works and does not…this is a challenge… Costs of working in a community, e.g., meta data not in job description (for modelers and monitoring)...) |
|||
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Mapping Next Steps | + | {{AQDS_Backlinks}}<br> |
+ | '''THANK YOU!''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Mapping Next Steps== | ||
− | |||
− | |||
Help…suggestions… | Help…suggestions… | ||
− | + | # Meeting report out by 3/7/08 | |
− | + | # Establish ad-hoc advisory committee sampled from this group (6-15), [with reporting to larger community] | |
− | + | # EPA AMI/GEOSS Keating short term systems RFA | |
− | + | # Scoping out data vision and plan: preferred future | |
− | + | ## Includes user communities and system objectives | |
− | + | ## Includes rules in terms of data standards and interface protocols | |
− | + | ## Includes explicit chaining connections | |
− | Multiple levels involved | + | == Multiple levels involved== |
− | Larger community: wiki advisory committee; community wide report include: | + | ===Larger community: wiki advisory committee; community wide report include:=== |
− | + | * inventory of systems | |
− | + | * opportunities for leveraging | |
− | + | * initial perspectives on inefficiencies | |
− | + | * recommendations on formatting and access conventions | |
− | + | * costs of participating in community systems (e.g., monitoring meta data) | |
− | + | * assessment (relative strengths and weaknesses of systems) | |
− | Federal agency | + | ===Federal agency=== |
− | + | * reviewing partnerships, especially EPA, NASA, NOAA ad hoc to date, data are a natural NASA has been major catalyst (Data Fed, ESIP)..FMGAQ | |
− | + | * role of U.S GEO…..who is guiding who here | |
− | EPA (OAR, OEI, ORD, ORD/NOAA) | + | ====EPA (OAR, OEI, ORD, ORD/NOAA)==== |
+ | * EPA integration systems are immature | ||
+ | * Management and coordination issues galore | ||
+ | * Assessment of systems???....systems run rampant…redundancies and inadequacies | ||
+ | * Chet/Rich…deliver recommendations/briefing to OAR/OEI and ORD management…illustrate redundancies, lack of coordination, blunt assessment | ||
+ | ** At a minimum remove barriers and provide incentives for responsibility in community framework | ||
+ | ** Challenging the single client concept | ||
+ | * Closer to home….cost of being in a community (e.g., monitoring group improving meta data, especially site representativeness for model evaluation) | ||
+ | * Ask IG to assess epa air data systems | ||
+ | * Or ..perform an objective assessment, system costs, user frequency, surveys… | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Media:DatasummitMapping_Next_Steps.doc]] | ||
− | + | [[LinkedTo::Community Air Quality Data System Workspace]] | |
− | + | [[LinkedTo::Data Summit Workspace]][[Date::2008-04-14]][[Subpage::Next Steps]][[Creator::Scheffe]] | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Latest revision as of 17:04, April 12, 2009
Back to <Data Summit Workspace
Back to <Community Air Quality Data System Workspace
THANK YOU!
Mapping Next Steps
Help…suggestions…
- Meeting report out by 3/7/08
- Establish ad-hoc advisory committee sampled from this group (6-15), [with reporting to larger community]
- EPA AMI/GEOSS Keating short term systems RFA
- Scoping out data vision and plan: preferred future
- Includes user communities and system objectives
- Includes rules in terms of data standards and interface protocols
- Includes explicit chaining connections
Multiple levels involved
Larger community: wiki advisory committee; community wide report include:
- inventory of systems
- opportunities for leveraging
- initial perspectives on inefficiencies
- recommendations on formatting and access conventions
- costs of participating in community systems (e.g., monitoring meta data)
- assessment (relative strengths and weaknesses of systems)
Federal agency
- reviewing partnerships, especially EPA, NASA, NOAA ad hoc to date, data are a natural NASA has been major catalyst (Data Fed, ESIP)..FMGAQ
- role of U.S GEO…..who is guiding who here
EPA (OAR, OEI, ORD, ORD/NOAA)
- EPA integration systems are immature
- Management and coordination issues galore
- Assessment of systems???....systems run rampant…redundancies and inadequacies
- Chet/Rich…deliver recommendations/briefing to OAR/OEI and ORD management…illustrate redundancies, lack of coordination, blunt assessment
- At a minimum remove barriers and provide incentives for responsibility in community framework
- Challenging the single client concept
- Closer to home….cost of being in a community (e.g., monitoring group improving meta data, especially site representativeness for model evaluation)
- Ask IG to assess epa air data systems
- Or ..perform an objective assessment, system costs, user frequency, surveys…
Media:DatasummitMapping_Next_Steps.doc
Community Air Quality Data System Workspace Data Summit Workspace2008-04-14Next StepsScheffe