Difference between revisions of "ResearchObjectCitation"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Ramapriyan (talk | contribs) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
* '''Contact Chair:''' | * '''Contact Chair:''' | ||
− | **Mark Parsons | + | **Mark Parsons <parsom3@rpi.edu> |
|bgcolor="pink" style="border: 1px solid gray;padding-left:0.5em;padding-right:0.5em;" width="50%"| | |bgcolor="pink" style="border: 1px solid gray;padding-left:0.5em;padding-right:0.5em;" width="50%"| | ||
===Resources=== | ===Resources=== | ||
+ | ===References=== | ||
+ | * McMurray, J. L. et al., Identifiers for the 21st century: How to design, provision, and reuse persistent identifiers to maximize utility and impact of life science data, PLOS Biology, June 29, 2017, [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001414 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001414] | ||
|} | |} |
Latest revision as of 12:16, February 20, 2019
This cluster is a merging of the data citation and software citation clusters to take on the broad challenge of general research object citation. How do we provide a reference that enables both access and credit to any given research object (data, software, article, instrument, sample, workflow, etc.)?
News
|
Activities |
Get Involved
|
ResourcesReferences
|