Difference between revisions of "ICommons"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(Created page with "<big>IT&I ESIP Commons Review</big> :'''Time:''' 8:30-10:00 :'''Location:''' Dupont :'''Convener:''' Ramachandran ==Action Items== *What content should go into the iCommons?...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 08:35, January 6, 2012
IT&I ESIP Commons Review
- Time: 8:30-10:00
- Location: Dupont
- Convener: Ramachandran
Action Items
- What content should go into the iCommons?
- What Content types/fields do we need
- DOI? Use current existing DOI/EZid scheme?
- What licenses do we need? Is Creative Commons sufficient?
- Decision to add options
- What Content types/fields do we need
- Will this supersede the wiki?
- Separation between wiki-workspace and iCommons-finished-space
- How do we encourage all of ESiP to use this framework?
- Add expectation to presenters
- Make this the beginning, middle, and end of session planning, poster session design, etc.
Key Topics
- Publication mechanism internal to ESiP
- ESiP Wiki helpful, but not sufficient
- Attribution and citations
- ESiP Wiki helpful, but not sufficient
- Need to create reference map for ingestion of microarticles
- Editor(s) will publish content submitted by authenticated users
- Two post-meeeting publications per year which capture the meeting activity
- Microarticles and internally published documents
- Conference meeting sessions captured
- Presenters, topics, presentations, video/audio/notes of session
- Professional Development
- Testbed Activity
- Links to above
- Lesson Plans
- Use Cases?
- Very much emerging
- Conference meeting sessions captured
- Potential for ESiP Administrative Materials
Contributions
Brainstorming session for data types and fields. Wide-ranging input from those with expertise in various areas. Group decisions to create, expand, and remove fields for various items.
Related Projects
- Coming soon.