Difference between revisions of "P&S Monthly Apr 20, 2011"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
− | :Proposal review | + | :'''Proposal review''' |
::Combine Hook's Discovery Cluster ideas with #1 Advertising ofFederation Member Services | ::Combine Hook's Discovery Cluster ideas with #1 Advertising ofFederation Member Services | ||
::Need Information Quality Cluster participation on #2 Data and Information Quality task | ::Need Information Quality Cluster participation on #2 Data and Information Quality task | ||
− | :::ACTION: Tyler to follow up with Greg Leptoukh, chair of ESIP Information Quality cluster | + | :::'''ACTION:''' Tyler to follow up with Greg Leptoukh, chair of ESIP Information Quality cluster |
::Looking for participation for #3 Metadata for Customized Product-Services | ::Looking for participation for #3 Metadata for Customized Product-Services | ||
:::ESIP Interoperability and Technology cluster (Rahul) | :::ESIP Interoperability and Technology cluster (Rahul) | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
::Everyone agreed that limiting the proposal to these 4 tasks would make sense | ::Everyone agreed that limiting the proposal to these 4 tasks would make sense | ||
::Getting buy-in/support from the other clusters/committees/groups is crucial to show the importance of the efforts across ESIP and the community. | ::Getting buy-in/support from the other clusters/committees/groups is crucial to show the importance of the efforts across ESIP and the community. | ||
− | ::ACTION: get the draft firmed up and send to committee email list for review/comment (Ken) | + | ::'''ACTION:''' get the draft firmed up and send to committee email list for review/comment (Ken) |
::Carol suggested it might be good to present testbed ideas/approach to the Exec Comm, to possibly solicit participation | ::Carol suggested it might be good to present testbed ideas/approach to the Exec Comm, to possibly solicit participation | ||
− | :::ACTION: present testbed ideas at the next ExCom telecon (Ken) | + | :::'''ACTION:''' present testbed ideas at the next ExCom telecon (Ken) |
− | ::ACTION: send final version to FinCom (Ken) | + | ::'''ACTION:''' send final version to FinCom (Ken) |
− | :ESIP Summer meeting plans | + | :'''ESIP Summer meeting plans''' |
::Request for session submitted (with Tyler and co-convener) | ::Request for session submitted (with Tyler and co-convener) | ||
::Ideas for session content | ::Ideas for session content |
Latest revision as of 13:56, April 20, 2011
Back to: Products and Services
Minutes April 20, 2011 Products and Services Telecon
Participants:Rob Raskin, John Scialdone, Tyler Stevens, Yuechen Chi, Hook Hua, Carol Meyer, Erin Robinson, Ken Keiser
Notes:
- Proposal review
- Combine Hook's Discovery Cluster ideas with #1 Advertising ofFederation Member Services
- Need Information Quality Cluster participation on #2 Data and Information Quality task
- ACTION: Tyler to follow up with Greg Leptoukh, chair of ESIP Information Quality cluster
- Looking for participation for #3 Metadata for Customized Product-Services
- ESIP Interoperability and Technology cluster (Rahul)
- ESIP Preservation and Stewardship cluster (Curt Tilne and Ruth Duerr)
- ESDSWG Standards process group (Richard Ullman)
- ESIP Standards Process group (Yonsook?)
- Rob will make one last effort to get write-up for semantic web task (#4)
- Everyone agreed that limiting the proposal to these 4 tasks would make sense
- Getting buy-in/support from the other clusters/committees/groups is crucial to show the importance of the efforts across ESIP and the community.
- ACTION: get the draft firmed up and send to committee email list for review/comment (Ken)
- Carol suggested it might be good to present testbed ideas/approach to the Exec Comm, to possibly solicit participation
- ACTION: present testbed ideas at the next ExCom telecon (Ken)
- ACTION: send final version to FinCom (Ken)
- ESIP Summer meeting plans
- Request for session submitted (with Tyler and co-convener)
- Ideas for session content
- Theme of meeting is data/information quality - Rob suggested a focus on that topic for part of the session
- maybe suggest a joint session topic with the Information Quality cluster - might be good since they are just starting out.
- Information quality is one of the proposed test bed activities so makes sense to have part of the session on that topic
- Probably good to have session topics focused on the current and proposed testbed activities, with an emphasis on participation from the other
- Rob mentioned that the Skills Database advocate is the ESIP front office - Carol and Erin
- Theme of meeting is data/information quality - Rob suggested a focus on that topic for part of the session
- Plan to discuss further and firm up plans on next telecon