Difference between revisions of "SOAPifying WCS"
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
In wcsfix.xsd and owsBase.xsd had several things that .NET 1.1, .NET 2.0 and MSXML 6.0 did | In wcsfix.xsd and owsBase.xsd had several things that .NET 1.1, .NET 2.0 and MSXML 6.0 did | ||
− | not consider legal. Due to complexity of the schema language, I do not know if the schemas were illegal or if they exposed bugs from Microsoft's validators. I have previously experienced both. These are tagged with comment | + | not consider legal. Due to complexity of the schema language, I do not know if the schemas were illegal or if they exposed bugs from Microsoft's validators. I have previously experienced both. These are tagged with comment 'FIX' in wcsfix.xsd |
*wcsCapabilities had a problematic type AbstractDescriptionBaseType which was edited heavily. | *wcsCapabilities had a problematic type AbstractDescriptionBaseType which was edited heavily. |
Revision as of 05:32, May 7, 2006
SOAPifying WCS: Approach and Issues
Kari Hoijarvi, CAPITA, hoijarvi@me.wustl.edu
WCS Schema Components
The WCS schema is assembled from multiple components. The official schemas are copied into into the DataFed workspace http://datafed.net/xs/OGC/wcs/1.0.0/
describeCoverage.xsd getCoverage.xsd gml4wcs.xsd owsBase.xsd values.xsd wcsCapabilities.xsd wcsfix.xsd
Schema components gml4wcs.xsd, values.xsd and xlinks.xsd (from ../../gml/3.1.1/xlink/xlinks.xsd) were used as is, but the other schemas were not legal and had to be fixed.
Fixing the WCS Schema
Schemas use "import" instead of "include" from the same namespace. The rule is, that schemas with different namespaces must import and a namespace that is partitioned must be included. Therefore http://datafed.net/xs/OGC/wcs/1.0.0/wcsfix.xsd contains all the schemas from namespace http://www.opengis.net/wcs. In my opinion, xml schema include is a mistake and should not be used.
In wcsfix.xsd and owsBase.xsd had several things that .NET 1.1, .NET 2.0 and MSXML 6.0 did not consider legal. Due to complexity of the schema language, I do not know if the schemas were illegal or if they exposed bugs from Microsoft's validators. I have previously experienced both. These are tagged with comment 'FIX' in wcsfix.xsd
- wcsCapabilities had a problematic type AbstractDescriptionBaseType which was edited heavily.
- wcsDescribecoverage was inserted as the were
- wcsGetCoverage has our extension FilterExtensionType which currently has only one element: loc_code to query point data for time view from a location. This cannot be implemented with bbox since locations may have the same lat+lon coordinates. WFS has a standard way to put in such a filter, but WCS does not. Here is an exaple of WFS service using loc_code filter and this is how our WCS query with loc_code looks. It would be a good idea to allow servers implement their own filter and aggregator extensions, just like WMS allows server specific parameters in the url.
WCS WSDL
The WCS web service is defined by its WSDL. The schema in the WSDL provides strong typing of the service IO. The service WSDL serves for both validating messages.
All the schema components were cobined into a single, 'fixed' WCS schema wcsfix.xsd. Next, the full wcsfix.xsd was then inserted into the WCS service WSDL. An outline of the WCS WSDL is pictured below.
Looking into nodes <message name="GetCapabilitiesIn">, you'll see that the input messages as well as the XML-based output messages are straight from wcs schema: input, output
wcs:GetCapabilities, wcs:WCS_Capabilities
wcs:DescribeCoverage, wcs:CoverageDescription
wcs:GetCoverage, N/A
Create Output Type
The GetCoverage call is problematic, because WCS returns often binary types like NetCDF, GeoTIFF etc. We added the element dfc:GetCoverageResponse for output:
<xs:element name="GetCoverageResponse"> <xs:complexType> <xs:all> <xs:element name="data" type="xs:anyURI"/> <xs:element name="content_type" type="xs:string"/> <xs:element name="format" type="xs:string"/> <xs:element name="domainSubset" type="wcs:DomainSubsetType"/> <xs:element ref="ncml:netcdf" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element ref="lin:Statistics" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element ref="lin:LineageList" minOccurs="0"/> </xs:all> </xs:complexType> </xs:element>
Although it is possible to embed binary data to soap output using mime types or base64 encoding, we did not go that way. The output contains an url to data, so that it can be retrieved using HTTP-GET request. In addition to this pointer to data, the envelope has:
- content type: for example application/x-netcdf
- format: the format that was used to query this data, for example NetCDF
- domainSubset: space and time boundaries for data
- ncml:netcdf: ncML description of data, if the data is in NetCDF cube
- Statistics: min, max, avg, sum, total_count, null_count
- LineageList: Soap input Envelope that was used for the query, optionally
- other comments like the actual SQL clause that was performed, the actual
- URL that was retrieved, etc.
SOAP Envelope
To create SOAP out of xml (which xml?) is just matter of wrapping it into an envelope:
<Envelope xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"> <Body> <GetCoverage ... </Body> </Envelope>
Summary
So in order to SOAPify WCS required:
- fixing some schemas
- including the combined fixed schemas in the WSDL
- creating output type in WSDL
- wraping xml into SOAP envelope
Realted Links
Link to an earlier WCS SOAP/WSDL page by Kari
Recommendation to GALEON by S. Nativi, L. Bigagli and P.Mazzetti, Feb 2006
- WCS bindings to HTTP GET/POST and SOAP should be consistent (this is a wellknown issue addressed in WCS 1.1).
- A standard description of the expected WCS SOAP interface (e.g a WCS wsdl) should be defined, to improve interoperability of SOAP-based WCS clients and servers. We would recommend SOAP service with literal encoding, due to parameters complexity using either RPC or Document style.
Early implementationof WCS SOAP wrapping at UFlorence/IMAA