Difference between revisions of "The Convention Making Process"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
# We use the [[Federated_Search | ESIP Federated Search cluster wiki]] as the working area for working on and accumulating "pieces" of the convention. | # We use the [[Federated_Search | ESIP Federated Search cluster wiki]] as the working area for working on and accumulating "pieces" of the convention. | ||
− | # We start [[ | + | # We start [[Federated_Search_Convention | a page on that wiki that will eventually become the document for the convention]], and send out a pointer to the mail list. Any and all participants will be authorized to update the page. |
# We should also have at least two implementations on both the client and server side, which will also be referenced in the wiki. | # We should also have at least two implementations on both the client and server side, which will also be referenced in the wiki. | ||
# When we have a stable convention and 2x2 implementations, we call that 1.0*. | # When we have a stable convention and 2x2 implementations, we call that 1.0*. |
Latest revision as of 13:02, September 9, 2009
- We use the ESIP Federated Search cluster wiki as the working area for working on and accumulating "pieces" of the convention.
- We start a page on that wiki that will eventually become the document for the convention, and send out a pointer to the mail list. Any and all participants will be authorized to update the page.
- We should also have at least two implementations on both the client and server side, which will also be referenced in the wiki.
- When we have a stable convention and 2x2 implementations, we call that 1.0*.
- At that point, we submit an RFC to the ESDSWG Standards Process Group.
- Should we also submit something to ESIP ITIC? Or some other ESIP body?
- Comments and suggestions for changes from steps (5) and (6) would go into version 1.1.
- After at least Version 1.0, we may consider submitting extensions to www.opensearch.org as well.