Difference between revisions of "OpenSearch Response Conventions"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This describes where the various links are located in the response, and how they are identified. | This describes where the various links are located in the response, and how they are identified. | ||
− | =Data Links= | + | =Background= |
+ | Within Atom, there is nonetheless a lot of room for variation in how responses are formatted. For integration purposes, we would like to specify conventions that address: | ||
+ | # How the "main" data link is identified | ||
+ | # How different access points to the data are described (e.g., FTP, HTTP, OPeNDAP) | ||
+ | # How browse is identified | ||
+ | # How additional metadata is enclosed: machine tags in the summary? Or an RDFa-like approach? Or something similar to the georss extension to OpenSearch? | ||
+ | # etc. | ||
+ | =Current Examples= | ||
+ | * [[GHRC OpenSearch Response]] | ||
+ | * [[Mirador OpenSearch Response]] | ||
+ | =Recommendations= | ||
+ | ==Data Links== | ||
TBS. | TBS. | ||
+ | |||
=Metadata Links= | =Metadata Links= | ||
TBS. | TBS. |
Revision as of 06:10, July 24, 2009
This describes where the various links are located in the response, and how they are identified.
Background
Within Atom, there is nonetheless a lot of room for variation in how responses are formatted. For integration purposes, we would like to specify conventions that address:
- How the "main" data link is identified
- How different access points to the data are described (e.g., FTP, HTTP, OPeNDAP)
- How browse is identified
- How additional metadata is enclosed: machine tags in the summary? Or an RDFa-like approach? Or something similar to the georss extension to OpenSearch?
- etc.
Current Examples
Recommendations
Data Links
TBS.
Metadata Links
TBS.
Browse/Preview Links
TBS.
OPeNDAP Links
TBS.
Other Links
TBS.
Semantic Markup
TBS.