Difference between revisions of "Client Application Experiences and Lessons Learned"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[July_16-18%2C_2008%2C_ESIP_Federation_Meeting%2C_Durham%2C_NH#Technical_Workshops_.28July_15.2C_2008.29 | Returnn to the master meeting page]]
+
[[July_16-18%2C_2008%2C_ESIP_Federation_Meeting%2C_Durham%2C_NH#Technical_Workshops_.28July_15.2C_2008.29 | Return to the master meeting page]]
  
 
Over the past several months a number of Federation members have formed a ''Client Applications Working Group'' as part of the Information Technology and Interoperability Committee. We have begun collecting our knowledge and experiences relating to different client applications and their support for a variety of data formats and standard services. A matrix and associated notes for this growing knowledge collection can be found at [[http://sites.google.com/e/tnms.org/esip-csti-wg/Home]].  
 
Over the past several months a number of Federation members have formed a ''Client Applications Working Group'' as part of the Information Technology and Interoperability Committee. We have begun collecting our knowledge and experiences relating to different client applications and their support for a variety of data formats and standard services. A matrix and associated notes for this growing knowledge collection can be found at [[http://sites.google.com/e/tnms.org/esip-csti-wg/Home]].  

Revision as of 12:47, April 16, 2008

Return to the master meeting page

Over the past several months a number of Federation members have formed a Client Applications Working Group as part of the Information Technology and Interoperability Committee. We have begun collecting our knowledge and experiences relating to different client applications and their support for a variety of data formats and standard services. A matrix and associated notes for this growing knowledge collection can be found at [[1]].

This session will provide a series of 20-minute presentations that summarize the different client application experiences captured in the matrix. We hope to finish with a client application cage match in which we set up multiple laptops with different clients accessing the same services, as a demonstration of the different implementations of support for some standard service interfaces.

Please contribute your experiences and knowledge to the matrix and submit an abstract for a brief presentation following the model below.