https://wiki.esipfed.org/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=131.253.46.251&feedformat=atomEarth Science Information Partners (ESIP) - User contributions [en]2024-03-19T01:24:17ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.35.14https://wiki.esipfed.org/w/index.php?title=CF_Standard_Names_-_CF_Standard_Names_-_Submitted_Atmospheric_Chemistry_and_Aerosol_Terms&diff=40950CF Standard Names - CF Standard Names - Submitted Atmospheric Chemistry and Aerosol Terms2012-09-15T19:22:10Z<p>131.253.46.251: Reverted edits by 208.115.111.66 (talk) to last revision by Ted.Habermann</p>
<hr />
<div>{{CF-links}}<br />
<br />
Version 1: 20.12.2006<br><br />
Version 2: 09.01.2007<br><br />
Version 3: 13.03.2007<br><br />
Version 4: 02.05.2007<br><br />
Version 5: 08.05.2007<br><br />
Version 6: 11.07.2007<br><br />
<br />
This table gives a list of variables that have been almost accepted by the CF community <br />
[http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata CF mailing list].<br />
<br />
The standard_names listed on this page are used within [http://aqm.jrc.it/HTAP/ model intercomparison] within the Task Force on Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution [http://www.htap.org/ TF HTAP]. However, as the simulations already started before the names have been officially approved by CF, some minor changes will be necessary.<br />
<br />
----<br />
<br />
'''TABLE VERSION 6'''<br />
<br />
{|{{prettytable}}<br />
|- style="background-color:#FF00FF;font-weight:bold"<br />
| width="446,25" Height="12,75" | CF Standard_name<br />
| width="75,75" | Canonical unit<br />
| width="198,75" | Explanation <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | <br />
| <br />
| <br />
<br />
|- style="background-color:#CCFFCC"<br />
|style="font-weight:bold" Height="12,75" | volume mixing ratios<br />
|style="font-weight:bold" | <br />
| <br />
<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | mole_fraction_of_gaseous_elemental_mercury_in_air<br />
| 1=mole mole-1<br />
| <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | mole_fraction_of_gaseous_divalent_mercury_in_air<br />
| 1=mole mole-1<br />
| <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | <br />
| <br />
| <br />
<br />
<br />
|- style="background-color:#CCFFCC;font-weight:bold"<br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency of atmospheric mass content due to dry deposition <br />
| <br />
| <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="102" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_all_nitrogen_oxides_expressed_as_nitrogen_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| NOy is the sum of all simulated oxidized nitrogen species, out of NO, NO2, HNO3, HNO4, HONO, NO3aerosol, NO3(radical), N2O5, PAN, other organic nitrates. Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Expressed as mass of N.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_ozone_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Expressed as mass of O3.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_nitric_acid_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Expressed as mass of HNO3.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_nitrogen_dioxide_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Expressed as mass of NO2.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_ammonia_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Expressed as mass of NH3.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_ammonium_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Expressed as mass of NH4.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_dimethyl_sulfide_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Expressed as mass of DMS.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_sulfur_dioxide_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Expressed as mass of SO2.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_sulfate_dry_aerosol_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Expressed as mass of SO4.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_black_carbon_dry_aerosol_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Expressed as mass of BC.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_particulate_organic_matter_dry_aerosol_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Particulate organic matter refers to all (secondary and primary) particulate organic matter aerosol, expect for black carbon. Expressed as mass of particulate organic matter.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_secondary_particulate_organic_matter_dry_aerosol_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Secondary particulate organic matter aerosol refers to particulate organic matter formed within the atmosphere from gaseous pre-cursors. Expressed as mass of particulate organic matter.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_primary_particulate_organic_matter_dry_aerosol_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Primary particulate organic matter refers to all particulate organic matter aerosol emitted as particles, expect for black carbon. Expressed as mass of particulate organic matter.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_seasalt_dry_aerosol_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Expressed as mass of sea salt.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_dust_dry_aerosol_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Expressed as mass of dust.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_hexachlorobiphenyl_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Expressed as mass of hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB-153).<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_alpha_hexachlorocyclohexane_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Expressed as mass of alpha_hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH).<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_gaseous_elemental_mercury_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Expressed as mass of Hg.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_gaseous_divalent_mercury_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Expressed as mass of Hg.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_mercury_dry_aerosol_due_to_dry_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Expressed as mass of Hg. <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | <br />
| <br />
| <br />
<br />
|- style="background-color:#CCFFCC;font-weight:bold"<br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency of atmospheric mass content due to dry deposition into stomata<br />
| <br />
| <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | <br />
| <br />
| <br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_ozone_due_to_dry_deposition_into_stomata<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of O3.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | <br />
| <br />
| <br />
<br />
|- style="background-color:#CCFFCC;font-weight:bold"<br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency of atmospheric mass content due to wet deposition<br />
| <br />
| <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="63,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_all_nitrogen_oxides_expressed_as_nitrogen_due_to_wet_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| NOy is the sum of all simulated oxidized nitrogen species, out of NO, NO2, HNO3, HNO4, HONO, NO3aerosol, NO3(radical), N2O5, PAN, other organic nitrates. Dry deposition includes gravitational settling, impact scavenging, and turbulent deposition. Expressed as mass of N.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_nitric_acid_due_to_wet_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of HNO3.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_ammonia_due_to_wet_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of NH3.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_ammonium_due_to_wet_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of NH4.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_dimethyl_sulfide_due_to_wet_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of DMS.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_sulfur_dioxide_due_to_wet_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of SO2.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_sulfate_dry_aerosol_due_to_wet_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of SO4.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_black_carbon_dry_aerosol_due_to_wet_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of BC.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_particulate_organic_matter_dry_aerosol_due_to_wet_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Particulate organic matter refers to all (primary and secondary) particulate organic matter aerosol, expect for black carbon. Expressed as mass of particulate organic matter.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_secondary_particulate_organic_matter_dry_aerosol_due_to_wet_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Secondary particulate organic matter aerosol refers to particulate organic matter formed within the atmosphere from gaseous pre-cursors. Expressed as mass of particulate organic matter.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_primary_particulate_organic_matter_dry_aerosol_due_to_wet_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Primary particulate organic matter refers to all particulate organic matter aerosol emitted as particles, expect for black carbon. Expressed as mass of particulate organic matter.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_seasalt_dry_aerosol_due_to_wet_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of sea salt.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_dust_dry_aerosol_due_to_wet_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of dust.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_hexachlorobiphenyl_due_to_wet_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB-153).<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_alpha_hexachlorocyclohexane_due_to_wet_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of alpha_hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH).<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_gaseous_elemental_mercury_due_to_wet_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of Hg.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_gaseous_divalent_mercury_due_to_wet_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of Hg.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_mercury_dry_aerosol_due_to_wet_deposition<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of Hg.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | <br />
| <br />
| <br />
<br />
|- style="background-color:#CCFFCC;font-weight:bold"<br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency of atmospheric mass content due to emissions <br />
| <br />
| <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | <br />
| <br />
| <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_carbon_monoxide_due_to_emission<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of CO. Integrate 3D emission field vertically to 2d field. <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_ammonia_due_to_emission<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of NH3. Integrate 3D emission field vertically to 2d field. <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_sulfur_dioxide_due_to_emission<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of SO2. Integrate 3D emission field vertically to 2d field. <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_sulfate_dry_aerosol_due_to_emission<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of SO4. Integrate 3D emission field vertically to 2d field. <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_dimethyl_sulfide_due_to_emission<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of DMS. Integrate 3D emission field vertically to 2d field. <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_black_carbon_dry_aerosol_due_to_emission<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of BC. Integrate 3D emission field vertically to 2d field. <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_particulate_organic_matter_dry_aerosol_due_to_chemical_net_production_and_emission<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Particulate organic matter refers to all (secondary and primary) particulate organic matter aerosol, expect for black carbon. Expressed as mass of particulate organic matter. If possible, indicate scale factor to obtain carbon mass. <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_secondary_particulate_organic_matter_dry_aerosol_due_to_chemical_net_production<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Secondary organic matter aerosol refers to particulate organic matter formed within the atmosphere from gaseous pre-cursors. Expressed as mass of particulate organic matter. If possible, indicate scale factor to obtain carbon mass. Integrate 3D emission field vertically to 2d field. <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_primary_particulate_organic_matter_dry_aerosol_due_to_emission<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Primary particulate organic matter refers to all particulate organic matter aerosol emitted as particles, expect for black carbon. Expressed as mass of particulate organic matter. If possible, indicate scale factor to obtain carbon mass. Integrate 3D emission field vertically to 2d field. <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_seasalt_dry_aerosol_due_to_emission<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of sea salt. <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_dust_dry_aerosol_due_to_emission<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of dust.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_hexachlorobiphenyl_due_to_emission<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB-153). Integrate 3D emission field vertically to 2d field. <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_alpha_hexachlorocyclohexane_due_to_emission <br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of alpha_hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH). Integrate 3D emission field vertically to 2d field. <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_hexachlorobiphenyl_due_to_re_emission<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB-153). Integrate 3D emission field vertically to 2d field. <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_alpha_hexachlorocyclohexane_due_to_re_emission<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of alpha_hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_gaseous_elemental_mercury_due_to_emission<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of Hg. Integrate 3D emission field vertically to 2d field. <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_gaseous_divalent_mercury_due_to_emission<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of Hg. Integrate 3D emission field vertically to 2d field. <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_mercury_dry_aerosol_due_to_emission<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| Expressed as mass of Hg. Integrate 3D emission field vertically to 2d field. <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_nox_expressed_as_nitrogen_due_to_emission<br />
| kg m-2 s-1<br />
| NOx=NO+NO2<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | <br />
| <br />
| <br />
<br />
<br />
|- style="background-color:#CCFFCC"<br />
|style="font-weight:bold" Height="12,75" | tendencies due to chemical reactions<br />
|style="font-weight:bold" | <br />
| <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | <br />
| <br />
| <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mole_concentration_of_ozone_due_to_chemical_gross_production<br />
| mole m-3 s-1<br />
| Gross chemical production refers to the sum of all reactions that produce O3.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_mole_concentration_of_ozone_chemical_gross_destruction<br />
| mole m-3 s-1<br />
| Gross chemical destruction refers to the sum of all reactions that destroy O3.<br />
<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_of_mole_concentration_of_methane_chemical_gross_destruction<br />
| mole m-3 s-1<br />
| Gross chemical destruction refers to the sum of all reactions that destroy CH4.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | tendency_of_atmosphere_of_mole_concentration_of_carbon_monoxide_chemical_gross_destruction<br />
| mole m-3 s-1<br />
| Gross chemical destruction refers to the sum of all reactions that destroy CO.<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | <br />
| <br />
| <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | <br />
| <br />
| <br />
<br />
|- style="background-color:#CCFFCC"<br />
|style="font-weight:bold" Height="12,75" | optical thickness<br />
| <br />
| <br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_pm10_ambient_aerosol<br />
| 1<br />
| The wavelength should be given as as scalar coordinate variables using the standard name radiation_wavelength<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_pm2p5_ambient_aerosol<br />
| 1<br />
| The wavelength should be given as as scalar coordinate variables using the standard name radiation_wavelength<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_pm1_ambient_aerosol<br />
| 1<br />
| The wavelength should be given as as scalar coordinate variables using the standard name radiation_wavelength<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_nitrate_ambient_aerosol<br />
| 1<br />
| The wavelength should be given as as scalar coordinate variables using the standard name radiation_wavelength<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_sulfate_ambient_aerosol<br />
| 1<br />
| The wavelength should be given as as scalar coordinate variables using the standard name radiation_wavelength<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_ammonium_ambient_aerosol<br />
| 1<br />
| The wavelength should be given as as scalar coordinate variables using the standard name radiation_wavelength<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_black_carbon_ambient_aerosol<br />
| 1<br />
| The wavelength should be given as as scalar coordinate variables using the standard name radiation_wavelength<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_seasalt_ambient_aerosol<br />
| 1<br />
| The wavelength should be given as as scalar coordinate variables using the standard name radiation_wavelength<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_dust_ambient_aerosol<br />
| 1<br />
| The wavelength should be given as as scalar coordinate variables using the standard name radiation_wavelength<br />
<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_particulate_organic_matter_ambient_aerosol<br />
| 1<br />
| The wavelength should be given as as scalar coordinate variables using the standard name radiation_wavelength<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="38,25" | atmosphere_optical_thickness_due_to_water_in_ambient_aerosol <br />
| 1<br />
| The wavelength should be given as as scalar coordinate variables using the standard name radiation_wavelength<br />
<br />
|- <br />
| Height="12,75" | <br />
| <br />
| <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
|}<br />
<br />
[[category:AQ_CoP]] [[category:Climate Forecast Conventions]]</div>131.253.46.251https://wiki.esipfed.org/w/index.php?title=AQ_Data_Network&diff=40944AQ Data Network2012-09-15T11:53:39Z<p>131.253.46.251: Reverted edits by 65.52.108.142 (talk) to last revision by Rhusar</p>
<hr />
<div><noinclude>{{AQ CoP Solta2011 Backlinks}}</noinclude><br />
<br />
<br />
* Servers<br />
* Clients<br />
* Catalog<br />
<br />
<br />
http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/AQ_Data_Systems_and_Processing_Centers</div>131.253.46.251https://wiki.esipfed.org/w/index.php?title=Interoperability_of_Air_Quality_Data_Systems&diff=40934Interoperability of Air Quality Data Systems2012-09-14T04:51:07Z<p>131.253.46.251: Reverted edits by Erinmr (talk) to last revision by Hoijarvi</p>
<hr />
<div>{{backlink}}<br><br />
Back to <[[Community Air Quality Data Systems Strategy]]<br><br />
{{AQDS_Backlinks}}<br> <br />
__NOTOC__ <br />
<br />
<center>This is the workspace for the Air Quality [http://www.earthobservations.org/documents/GEO%20Rules%20of%20Procedure.pdf Community of Practice] on: </center><br />
===<center> <big>Interoperability of Air Quality Data Systems through WCS, WMS ...Standards</big></center>===<br />
<center> [[Interoperability of Air Quality Data Systems_Participants|Participants]] | [[Talk:{{PAGENAME}}| Forum]] | [[About_{{PAGENAME}}|About]] | [[Wiki Quick Start| Wiki Help]]</center><br />
<br />
{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="zborder-top:1px solid #aaaaaa; border-collapse: collapse;" <br />
|- align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#FFFFEE"<br />
|style="border: 1px solid gray;" width="50%"|<br />
<br />
===<center><b>What's New</b></center>===<br />
* 2010-05-05: [[WCS_NetCDF-CF_Updates| What's new for WCS for NetCDF-CF]]<br />
* 2010-02-20: [[Standards_Implementation_Virtual_Workshops| Standards Implementation Virtual Workshops]]<br />
* 2009-06-11: [[How to Make an XSL]]<br />
* 2009-05-24: [[WMS GetCapabilities]]<br />
* 2009-05-20: [[WCS_Access_to_netCDF_Files| Create WCS with netCDF Files]]<br />
* 2008-04-30: [[Subcommittee on Interoperability]]<br />
* 2008-02-26: [[Networking_of_Air_Quality_Data|Networking of Air Quality Data page]]<br />
* 2008-02-19: Interop AQ Data System workspace created <br />
<br />
| valign="top" bgcolor="#FFFFEE" style="border: 1px solid gray;" width="50%"|<br />
<br />
===<center><b>Context</b></center>===<br />
* {{Template:GEO_Links}} <br />
* {{Template:GEOSS_Committees}}<br />
* '''EPA Programs''': [http://www.htap.org/ Hemispheric Transport (HTAP)] | [[Exceptional Air Pollution Event Analysis Community Workspace|Exceptional Events]] | [[Data_Summit_Workspace| Data Summit]]<br />
<br />
|}<br />
{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="zborder-top:1px solid #aaaaaa; border-collapse: collapse;" <br />
|- align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"<br />
|style="border: 1px solid gray;padding-left:0.5em;padding-right:0.5em;" width="50%"|<br />
=== <center><b>WCS Resources </b></center> ===<br />
* [[WCS_Access_to_netCDF_Files| Create WCS with netCDF Files]]<br />
* [http://del.icio.us/tag/WCS%2Btutorial%2Binteroperability%2BWS%3AInteroperability%2B WCS Tutorials] | [http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/Earth_Science_Data:_Why_So_Difficult%3F Earth Science Data - Why so difficult?] - C. Lynnes ideas? <br />
* [http://del.icio.us/tag/WCS%2Breference%2Binteroperability%2BWS%3AInteroperability WCS Papers, PPTs]<br />
* [http://del.icio.us/tag/WCS%2Binteroperability%2BWS%3AInteroperability%2Btools WCS Tools]<br />
* [http://www-pcmdi.llnl.gov/cf CF Convention] | [http://www-pcmdi.llnl.gov/cf/documents/cf_standard_names/ CF Standard Names] | [[Air Quality/Chemistry Naming Conventions| CF Chemistry Names]] <br />
<br />
----<br />
* [[DataFed_Data_Access_Services|DataFed Data Access Services]]<br />
---<br />
<br />
=== WMS Resources ===<br />
<br />
|style="border: 1px solid gray;padding-left:0.5em;padding-right:0.5em;" width="50%"|<br />
<br />
===<center><b>[[Interoperability Projects, Demos, Resources|Interop Projects/Demos/Challenges]]</b></center>===<br />
* [http://del.icio.us/tag/reference%2Binteroperability%2BWS%3AInteroperability%2BGeneral Gen. Interoperability Papers, PPTs]<br />
* [[EPA_Air_Quality_Data_Systems_and_GEOSS_Architecture| GEOSS Architecture Demo]] | [[Service_Collaboration_Demos| ESIP Interope. Demos]] | [http://del.icio.us/tag/WCS%2Bdemo%2Binteroperability%2BWS%3AInteroperability WCS Demos]<br />
* [[Integrated Global Dataset]] | [[HTAP_GEOSS]]<br />
* [http://datafedwiki.wustl.edu/index.php/Collaboration DataFed Collaborations]<br />
* [[Air quality interoperability challenges| T. Keating: Interoperability Challenges]]<br />
* [[Interoperability_and_Technology|ESIP Interoperability and Technology Commettee]]<br />
* [[GALEON-related_Services|GALEON-related Services]]<br />
* [http://www.ogcnetwork.net/AIpilot GEOSS AIP]<br />
* [[Data Summit Workspace| Data Summit]] | [[Community_Air_Quality_Data_System_Workspace| Community Air Quality Data System]]<br />
* [[Service Interoperability Experiments]]<br />
|}<br />
{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="zborder-top:1px solid #aaaaaa; border-collapse: collapse;" <br />
|- align="left" valign="top" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"<br />
|style="border: 1px solid gray;padding-left:0.5em;padding-right:0.5em;" width="50%"|<br />
<br />
=== <center><b>Outcome: Air Quality Data Network</b></center> ===<br />
[[Image:DataSystemConnectivityMatrix.png|300px]]<br />
* [[Data System Connectivity Matrix]], S. Falke, E. Robinson? (Why half matrix? RBH)<br />
* [[Networking_of_Air_Quality_Data|Networking of Air Quality Data page]]<br />
<br />
|style="border: 1px solid gray;padding-left:0.5em;padding-right:0.5em;" width="50%"|<br />
<br />
===<center><b>Data Systems</b></center>===<br />
<ask limit="100" >[[Category:DataSystem]][[DataSystemName:=+]]</ask><br />
<br />
<br />
|}<br />
* [[Component_Web_Services_and_Service_Chaining]]<br />
* [[Service Interoperability Tests]]<br />
* [[DataFed_Service_Chain_Example]]<br />
* [[Service Interoperability Experiments]]<br />
* [[Trajectory Service Design Pattern]]<br />
* [[The OGC Web Coverage Service Specification and Its Implementation]]<br />
* [[ISRSE 2009 Service Demonstration Information]]<br />
* [[Web Service Protocols]]<br />
* [[NASA GSFC DISC Web Coverage Service for OMI NO2]]<br />
<br />
* Dif > GetCapabilities <br />
* Dif > ISO<br />
* [[Benefits of Interoperability]]<br><br />
<br />
[[Category:WS:Workspace]][[Category:Interoperability]][[Category:WS:{{PAGENAMEE}}]]<br />
<br />
[[LinkedTo::Community Air Quality Data System Workspace]][[Workspace::Interoperability of Air Quality Data Systems]]<br />
[[LinkedTo::Data Summit Workspace]][[Date::2008-04-14]][[Subpage::Interoperability of Air Quality Data Systems]][[Creator::Husar]]</div>131.253.46.251https://wiki.esipfed.org/w/index.php?title=ESIP_2011_Winter_Meeting_Decisions_Workshop&diff=40933ESIP 2011 Winter Meeting Decisions Workshop2012-09-14T04:25:14Z<p>131.253.46.251: Reverted edits by Prados (talk) to last revision by Erinmr</p>
<hr />
<div>[[January_6,_2011| Back to Jan 6, 2011 Agenda]] | [[Decisions | Back to Decisions Workspace]] <br />
<br />
'''Introduction to Evaluation Workshop<br />
<br />
Ann Doucette, Director, The Evaluators' Institute, George Washington University <br />
<br />
'''From Insight to Impact: Managing YOUR Data Through Evaluation<br />
<br />
''Sponsored by the Decisions Cluster, this workshop covers evaluation basics and GEO as a Case Study for how to improve the value of ESIP member activities through evaluation. Does not require previous experience with project evaluation'' <br />
<br />
Interventions and programs are implemented within complex environments that present challenges in evaluating efficiency and effectiveness and attributing outcomes and impact to specific actions. A general problem in evaluation efforts — and what often causes them to fall short of their intended objectives — is the failure to fully articulate a theory of change that includes the identification of critical mechanisms that support optimal outcomes; to select measureable objectives that are actionable, meaning that they are linked to practices that an organization can actually do something about; to incorporate diverse stakeholders including end-users; to craft the evaluation in terms of its role in data-driven decision-making; and, lastly to effectively communicate the return on investment in terms of not only cost, but human and social capital. <br />
<br />
This workshop will provide an interactive opportunity for participants to become more familiar with effective evaluation approaches that include a focus on crafting a theory of change that characterizes the outcome goal(s) and impact as well as identifying the mechanisms of change – moving from activity to results. Matching evaluation levels with the objectives to be achieved (e.g., linking gap analysis with theory of change, etc.) will be addressed, as well as optimizing the actionability of evaluation efforts. The workshop will examine performance measurement strategies that support actionable data. Data based decision-making, value-based issues, and practice-based evidence related to evaluation and monitoring (M & E) activities (process, outcome, and impact) will be emphasized. A case study approach, focusing on the work of the Group on Earth Observations will be used as an illustrative example of how members of the Federation of Earth Science Information Partners can better use evaluation tools to achieve outcomes and to optimize the impact of their work.<br />
<br />
<br />
=== Notes from Session ===<br />
<br />
Insight to Impact<br />
* Why Evaluate<br />
** To provide credible information and verify that initiative is doing as planned<br />
** Assess impact<br />
** Discover challenges early to optimize outcome/impact<br />
** Prioritize resources and activities, to make changes and insure sustainability<br />
* Addressing complexity<br />
** ESIP is a difficult organization to evaluate due to its diverse membership<br />
*** Examine individual objectives instead of just goals<br />
** Complex systems like ESIP:<br />
*** Connections are essential +simple rules lead to complex responses + Individuals have creative opportunity to respond within rules<br />
*** Requires complex evaluation methods<br />
** Complex adaptive systems:<br />
*** Input → activity→ output → outcome → IMPACT<br />
*** Output is evaluated and feedback into the system as another input<br />
*** Impact addresses that product was not only used, but that the use had an effect.<br />
** Traditional approach: past events predict future outcomes<br />
** Emergence- agents interact in random ways (interpersonal relationships and social networking)<br />
** Connectivity – systems depend on interconnections and feedback→ dissemination across stakeholders<br />
** Interdependence - of environment and other human systems.<br />
*** Butterfly effects, small changes have large impacts, cultural sensitivity to the differences between agencies involved in ESIP<br />
** Rules- systems are governed by simple conventions that are self-organized.<br />
*** Underlying consistencies and patterns may appear random and lead to different outcomes than anticipated<br />
** Outcomes are optimized in terms of meeting specific thresholds, predictability is not expected except in broad focus.<br />
* Where to start? Discussion of 1st Key Evaluation Findings<br />
** Concerns and Recommendations<br />
*** Stakeholder focused - unmet needs, varying expectations, no when or why → Improve communication strategy/ clarify purpose, process, value added and engagement of wider audience/ Establish clear mechanisms for acknowledging contributions<br />
*** Geoss Focused - detrimental effect of voluntary nature, lack of resources→ conduct gap analysis, alternative models, long-term strategy for support and sustainability (membership fees)<br />
*** Many suggestions ambiguous, and not really actionable<br />
<br />
* Managing Data Complexity/Characterizing Programs<br />
** Plausibility – correct logic<br />
** Feasibility – sufficient resources<br />
** Measurability – credible ways to discover results<br />
** Meaningfulness – stakeholders can see effects<br />
* Theory of Change<br />
** Identifies a causal pathway from implementation of the program to the intended outcomes by specifying what is needed for outcomes to be achieved<br />
** To build one:<br />
*** Identify long-term goals and assumptions behind them<br />
*** Backwards mapping and connect the preconditions or requirements necessary to achieve that goal<br />
*** Identifying the interventions that your initiative will perform<br />
*** Develop indicators to evaluate outcome<br />
*** Writing a narrative to explain the logic<br />
** Outcome mapping <br />
*** Causal chain between short-term outcome and long-term goals.<br />
** Looking for impact<br />
*** Identify intermediate outcomes<br />
*** Use near-real-time assessment<br />
* Approaches to Evaluation<br />
** Needs assessment – magnitude of need, possible solutions<br />
** Evaluability assessment – has there been sufficient implementation<br />
** Conceptualization-focused evaluation – help define the program, target population, possible outcomes<br />
** Implementation evaluation<br />
** Process evaluation<br />
** Developmental evaluation – focus on innovative engagement<br />
** Outcome evaluation<br />
** Impact evaluation<br />
** Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis – standardizing outcomes in dollar costs and values<br />
** Meta-analysis – studies impact across studies of a similar magnitude for an overall judgment on an evaluation question<br />
* Gap analysis<br />
** Existing status<br />
** Apirants – condition in comparison to other competing organizations<br />
** Market – potential to grow given current political economic and demographic conditions<br />
** Program/product – are there products not being produced that could be?<br />
* Data collection<br />
** Outcome based monitoring – don’t collect data for the sake of it, monitor to benefit the outcome and achieve goals<br />
** Goal driven management – needs to be done for a reason, not because it is the rule<br />
** Go from best-guess decisions to data-based decision making<br />
** Cooperate across partners, collaboration is priority over competition/discrimination between different departments or roles<br />
** Anticipate need instead of reacting<br />
** Information is disseminated and transparent<br />
* Measurement Precision<br />
** Consistency and accuracy – not fixed, variable due to differences in collection procedures and understanding of data<br />
** Measuring validity of the pipeline of data, not the scientific validity of the content.<br />
* Validity<br />
* Balancing data and methods<br />
** Qualitative v quantitative, contextual v less contextual<br />
** Attitudes and underlying reasons v pure data<br />
** Anecdotal data can be mined using qualitative software if there are enough stories and statements<br />
* Randomized clinical trials<br />
** Do not always provide better evidence than observational studies – especially for rare adverse effects<br />
* Comparative effectiveness research<br />
** Conducting and synthesizing existing research comparing the benefits and harms of different strategies and interventions to monitor condition sin “real world” settings<br />
* Strength of Evidence<br />
** Risk of bias <br />
** Consistency<br />
** Directness<br />
** Precision<br />
*** Dose-response association – differential exposure/duration of participation<br />
*** Confounding factors – present or absent<br />
*** Magnitude of the effect/impact – strong or weak<br />
*** Publication bias – selective publication of studies/ no current studies available<br />
** Grading strength – high/moderate/low/insufficient : based on availability of evidence and extent that it reflects reality<br />
* Establishing metrics – SMART approach<br />
** Specific <br />
** Measureable <br />
** Actionable <br />
** Relevant <br />
** Timely<br />
*** Analytic too SWOT<br />
**** Strengths<br />
**** Weaknesses<br />
**** Opportunities<br />
**** Threats<br />
***** Identify how to harness opportunities and strengths in order to tackle weaknesses and threats<br />
***** Not just a list of factors, a list of actions</div>131.253.46.251https://wiki.esipfed.org/w/index.php?title=Interagency_Data_Stewardship/LifeCycle/Preservation_Forum/TeleconNotes/2012-05-02&diff=40920Interagency Data Stewardship/LifeCycle/Preservation Forum/TeleconNotes/2012-05-022012-09-13T17:39:34Z<p>131.253.46.251: Reverted edits by Ramdeen (talk) to last revision by Ctilmes</p>
<hr />
<div>Back to [[Preservation and Stewardship]] / [[Interagency_Data_Stewardship/LifeCycle/Preservation_Forum/TeleconNotes|Telecons]]<br />
<br />
===ESIP Preservation Committee Monthly Telecon 2012-05-02===<br />
<br />
Telecon: 1-877-668-4493<br/><br />
Access Code 925 605 953 <br/><br />
[https://esipfed.webex.com/esipfed/j.php?ED=193395612&UID=0&PW=NZTVhYzcwOWZm&RT=MiMxMQ%3D%3D Webex]<br/><br />
Password: datapres<br/><br />
4:00pm ET / 3:00pm CT / 2:00pm MT / 1:00pm PT<br />
<br />
Agenda:<br />
<br />
# New Student Fellow: Sarah Ramdeen<br />
# [[Summer_2012_Meeting | ESIP Summer Meeting]]<br />
# AGU<br />
# ESIP Activity State of the Art documents [[media:stateOfTheArt.doc | Draft State of the Art Template]]<br />
## [[Data_Stewardship/State_Of_The_Art/Data_Stewardship_Principles | Data Stewardship Principles]]<br />
## [[Data_Stewardship/State_Of_The_Art/Identifiers | Identifiers]]<br />
## [[Data_Stewardship/State_Of_The_Art/Data_Citations | Data Citations]]<br />
# Guidelines maintenance process: [[Interagency_Data_Stewardship/Principles | Data Sharing Principles]], [[Interagency_Data_Stewardship/Citations/provider_guidelines | Data Citation Guidelines]], [[Provenance and Context Content Standard]]</div>131.253.46.251https://wiki.esipfed.org/w/index.php?title=Integrated_Global_Dataset&diff=40904Integrated Global Dataset2012-09-13T10:09:24Z<p>131.253.46.251: Reverted edits by 65.52.110.151 (talk) to last revision by Erinmr</p>
<hr />
<div>{| width="830px" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="zborder-top:0px solid #FFFFFF; border-collapse: collapse;" <br />
|- valign="top" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"<br />
|align="center"|<br />
[[image:ForestSmokePic.png|100px]] [[image:ForestSmokeSat.png|100px]] [[image:DustFrontPic.png|100px]] [[image:DustFrontSatTexas.png|100px]] [[image:Volcano.png|100px]] [[image:July4th_04_S.png|100px]] <br />
|}<br />
----<br />
{| width="830px" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="zborder-top:0px solid #FFFFFF; border-collapse: collapse;" <br />
|- valign="top" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"<br />
|align="right" width="25%"|<br />
[[image:CommunityNetwork.png|120px]]<br />
| align="center" valign="top" width="50%"|<br />
Wiki purpose: Development of an integrated global scale dataset and test bed for evaluating HTAP Models <br />
| align="left" valign="top" width="25%"|<br />
[[image:EEINetLL.png|120px]]<br />
|}<br />
{| width="100%" cellpadding=0 cellspacing=1<br />
|- valign="top" bgcolor="#E5FFFF" <br />
|style="border: 1px solid gray;padding-left:1em;padding-right:0.5em;" width="50%" bgcolor=#FFFFFF|<br />
====What's New====<br />
* 2007-03-29: This data integration wiki exposed to HTAP <br />
* 2007-03-25: Data integration wiki page set-up<br />
<br />
|valign="top" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" style="border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:gray;padding-left:1em;padding-right:1em;" width="50%"|<br />
====Links for HTAP==== <br />
* [http://del.icio.us/tag/HTAP+TF General] | [http://del.icio.us/tag/HTAP+TF+Meeting Meetings] | [http://del.icio.us/tag/HTAP+TF+Modeling Modeling]<br />
* [http://del.icio.us/tag/HTAP+TF+Project Projects] | [http://del.icio.us/tag/HTAP+TF+Discussion Discussion] | [http://del.icio.us/tag/HTAP+TF+Wiki Wikis] <br />
|}<br />
{| width="100%" cellpadding=0 cellspacing=1<br />
|- valign="top" bgcolor="#E5FFFF" <br />
|style="border: 1px solid gray;padding-left:1em;padding-right:0.5em;" width="50%" bgcolor=#FFFFFF|<br />
====[[HTAP Report, Sub-Chap. 6 - Data/Info System]]====<br />
Communal workspace for the subchapter on the HTAP information system framework and data integration <br />
|valign="top" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" style="border-style:solid;border-width:1px;border-color:gray;padding-left:1em;padding-right:1em;" width="50%"|<br />
<br />
====Datasets for HTAP [http://datafedwiki.wustl.edu/index.php/2007-03-26:_Datasets_for_HTAP_through_DataFed (See All)] ==== <br />
Communal workspace for HTAP integrated datasets<br />
|}<br />
{| width="830px" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="zborder-top:0px solid #FFFFFF; border-collapse: collapse;" <br />
|- valign="top" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"<br />
|align="center"|<br />
This wiki is the workspace of the ''ad hoc'' virtual workgroup... <br />
The wiki is coordinated by ... and involves many other [[HTAP_people|people]]. <br />
|}<br />
<br />
__NOTOC__<br />
[[WS::{{PAGENAMEE}}]][[Category:HTAP]]</div>131.253.46.251https://wiki.esipfed.org/w/index.php?title=Ontologies&diff=40896Ontologies2012-09-13T08:07:02Z<p>131.253.46.251: Reverted edits by Steveolding (talk) to last revision by Kbene</p>
<hr />
<div>Ontologies for Earth system science<br />
<br />
Controlled vocabularies are convenient for associating measured parameters with standard names. Ontologies expand the capabilities of controlled vocabularies by providing more descriptive semantic power. For example, ontologies enable descriptions such as: 1) for “surface” temperature, express the actual height above the ground; 2) for “Deviation from the average”, describe the actual climatology the average is based upon; 3) for web services, provide service descriptions and limitations.<br />
<br />
This 1-hour presentation gives an overview on how to build and extend ontologies using the OWL language. It describes the SWEET 2.0, including its concepts of science, data, and services. SWEET 2.0 differs from 1.1 in being reorganized for easy expansion by domain specialists wanting to extend the content.</div>131.253.46.251https://wiki.esipfed.org/w/index.php?title=January_5,_2011&diff=40895January 5, 20112012-09-13T07:54:41Z<p>131.253.46.251: Reverted edits by 65.52.108.142 (talk) to last revision by Erinmr</p>
<hr />
<div><small><br />
{| class="wikitable" width="100%"<br />
| align="left" | [[January_4%2C_2011|'''< January 4''']]<br />
| align="right" | [[January_6%2C_2011|'''> January 6''']]<br />
|}<br />
</small><br />
<br />
{| class="wikitable" border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0"<br />
! align="center" colspan="3" style="background:#f0f0f0;" | Wednesday, January 5, 2011<br />
|-<br />
! Time<br />
! Session Details<br />
! Location<br />
|-<br />
| 7:00<br />
| Registration Desk Open<br />
| Lower Level Foyer<br />
|-<br />
| 8:30 - 10:00<br />
| Federal Panel on Agency Needs for Program Evaluation ([http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/File:ESIP_-_Friedl_-_Performance_n_Impacts.pdf Lawrence Friedl], NASA; Charles Baker, NOAA, Linda Gundersen, USGS; [http://wiki.esipfed.org/index.php/File:ESIP_2011_Butler_Wed.pdf Katie Butler], EPA)<br />
| New Hampshire Ballroom<br />
|-<br />
| style="white-space:nowrap;" |9:45 - 10:15<br />
| Break <br />
| Lower Level Foyer <br />
|-<br />
| rowspan="2" | 10:15 - 12:15<br />
| ESIP Federation Assembly [[Business Meeting]]<br />
| City Center Ballroom<br />
|-<br />
| [[ESIP_Discovery_Cluster_2011_Winter_Meeting|ESIP Discovery Feed Services: OpenSearch, Dataset Casting, Collection Casting, and Service Casting]]<br />
| Georgetown <br />
|-<br />
| 12:15 - 1:45<br />
| Lunch with Speaker, [[Media:ESIP Keynote for MK-NESDIS101- 1-4-2011 mppaheditsv2--4FINAL.pdf|''NOAA Satellites – 2010 and Beyond'']], Mary Kicza, NOAA Assistant Administrator for Satellite and Information Services<br />
| New Hampshire Ballroom <br />
|-<br />
| rowspan="5" | 1:45 - 3:15<br />
| bgcolor="#ffffaa"|Track 1 [[Interagency Data Stewardship/LifeCycle/Jan2011Meeting|Data Preservation and Stewardship]]<br />
| bgcolor="#ffffaa"|Foggy Bottom <br />
|-<br />
| bgcolor="#aaaaff"|Track 2 [[Air_Quality_Breakout,_ESIP_2011_Winter_Meeting | Air Quality]]<br />
| bgcolor="#aaaaff"|Dupont<br />
|-<br />
| bgcolor="#aaffff"|Track 3 [[Level 2 Data Search and Subset Tools]]<br />
| bgcolor="#aaffff"|Georgetown<br />
|-<br />
| bgcolor="#aaffaa"|Track 4 [[Energy_Cluster_Jan_2011_Agenda|Energy]]<br />
| bgcolor="#aaffaa"|Mt. Vernon<br />
|-<br />
| bgcolor="#ffaaff"|Track 5 [[Semantic Web Tutorial]]<br />
| bgcolor="#ffaaff"|Potomac <br />
|-<br />
| 3:15 - 3:45<br />
| Break <br />
| Lower Level Foyer<br />
|-<br />
| rowspan="5" | 3:45 - 5:15<br />
| bgcolor="#ffffaa"|Track 1 [[Interagency Data Stewardship/LifeCycle/Jan2011Meeting|Data Preservation and Stewardship]]<br />
| bgcolor="#ffffaa"|Foggy Bottom <br />
|-<br />
| bgcolor="#aaaaff"|Track 2 [[Air_Quality_Breakout,_ESIP_2011_Winter_Meeting | Air Quality]]<br />
| bgcolor="#aaaaff"|Dupont<br />
|-<br />
| bgcolor="#777777"|Track 3 Open<br />
| bgcolor="#777777"|Georgetown<br />
|-<br />
| bgcolor="#aaffaa"|Track 4 [[Energy_Cluster_Jan_2011_Agenda|Energy]]<br />
| bgcolor="#aaffaa"|Mt. Vernon <br />
|-<br />
| bgcolor="#ffaaff"|Track 5 [[Semantic Web Tutorial]]<br />
| bgcolor="#ffaaff"|Potomac <br />
|-<br />
|}</div>131.253.46.251