Sustainable Data Management/20200710 telcon notes
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
To connect
- Join from computer, tablet or smartphone at: https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/618011013
- Dial in using your phone: :United States: +1 (571) 317-3122
- Access Code: 618-011-013
Agenda
- summary/discussion of the TRUST mini-symposium.
- Hoping some of you have read the TRUST paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-020-0486-7
- Reminder: put this on your sched:
- Aligning data publishing workflows among repositories, publishers, funders, and researches
Attending
- Margaret O'Brien (scribe)
- Shelley Stall
- Megan Carter
- Sophie Hou
- Helen Glaves
- Philip Tarrant
- Ruth Duerr
- Erin Antognoii
- Rebecca Koskela (post CDF)
Regrets
- Corinna
- Rebecca
Notes
TRUST mini-symp concentric circles. diagram.
- Recording here: https://www.rdc-drc.ca/activities/webinars/archived-webinars/
- repositories focus on implementation, an inner Circle, within Aspirations (TRUST, FAIR, CARE) and certification (CTS, WDS, ISO)
- CORE https://gida-global.org/care
- Recommendations for Services in a FAIR Data Ecosystem: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100058
- within that, the HOW (rather than the WHAT)
- Aspiration (in the TRUST outer circle) are open to interpretation. Our guidelines describe implementation.
- Suggestion: a Matrix:
FAIR, CARE, TRUST x repo how-items
- Audience for eventual doc:
- groups aspiring to be repository
- promote use of an existing repo instead of web page-posting)
- even individual researchers do this.
- Root cause of the web-page-problem: researchers cannot find repositories that meet their needs
- existing repos aspiring to certification
- in order to fulfills what your communities ask for (fair, trust, core), here is what repo comm has determined are the base capabilities
- groups aspiring to be repository
- researchers?
- repo-search tools can use these to find repos that meet your needs.
- Issues a repository-how matrix does not meet:
- What about the rest of the data life cycle? some aspects happen outside of the repo.
- To do: vocabularies (for us)
Define "repository": ? Other vocabulary needed (responsibility, authority,
- expressed at CDF: repos get different sets of requirements from funders, publishers, community. are we adding to that? or unifying?
- Neither: we are the repository community, we address it like this. ie, repo community is at the top, defining requirements, not just the receiver.
- Post link to new CDF leadership: _____
- we overlap, Corinna, Bob (others?)
Goals:
- Context for justifying funding for repository improvements, alleviate repos angst (who cannot yet meet these guidelines)
- Roadmap: prioritize some parts (eg, the T of trust, then items within that)
- research community become discerning consumers.
Action Items
- add new folks to list serve - mob
- get TRUST mini symp link - mob
- start a spreadsheet to brainstorm on a matrix - Ruth
- look at the Sustainable DM google drive?
- https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1JtilFsKtmB4k3_k-dbVS-EsbM8HFQur1