Hb use template
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Discusssion of Use Case preliminaries
Use Case "types"
- Not sure we have the right category names for the two types of use cases we are collecting. Suggest changing "Application" Use Case to "ESIP" Use Case. Also, possibly change "Systems" Use Case to "Technical Solutions" Use Cases.
Wiki page naming convention
Current suggestion
- Naming Format
- Use Case <Cluster>.<SubArea>.<number>.<letter>: <Short Name>
- Example usage
- Use Case AQ.Smoke.1.a: Smoke plume event detection and related dataset discovery
- <Cluster>
- {AQ, DM, EC, EF, PH, WM}
- <number>
- {1, 2, 3, ...}
- <letter>
- {a, b, c, ...}
Burrows comments
- This naming convention may put too much of our current conceptual model into the structure of the wiki. I'd prefer that we let each contributor assure that they have a unique pagename and not link the page names to current clusters and their current substructure.
Plain Language Description
Short Definition
Define the use case in plain sentences and wherever possible, avoid specifying technical solutions or implementation choices. Concentrate on the application aspects of the intended scenario.
Purpose
A plain language description of why this use case exists, what the problem is to be solved, and what a successful outcome and impact may be.
Describe a scenario of expected use
A verbose (more detailed) description of one instance of a problem to be solved, what resources are generally needed (if known) and what a successful outcome and impact may be. In this case, who might be expected to do the work or provide the resources and who might be expected to benefit from the work.
Definition of Success
Quick test that would show whether or not the case is working as described.
Formal Use Case Identification
Use Case Designation
- <Cluster>.<SubArea>.<number>.<letter>
Use Case Name
- <Insert short name and long name>
Revision Information
- Prepared by:
- <Author(s) with responsibility>
- <Affiliation>
- <Date/Time created>
- Version X.N.a (can be labeled draft if X=0)
- Modified by:
- <Modifier Name/Affil>, <Date/time>, <Brief Description>
Formal Use Case Description
Definition
First paragraph is short description, second paragraph, etc. may contain further details.
Through this use case, the system User locates and identifies datasets (collections of related grandules) for use or processing. This process results in the User having access to a subset of the datasets in the portal that meet the requirements of the User. Individual datasets, and their constituent granules, may then be identified for further action or processing (e.g. Visualization, analysis, download).
Successful Outcomes
- 1.Operation succeeds and user obtains QQQ.
Failure Outcomes
- 1.Operation fails to return any XXX. Should instead YYYY.
- 2.Illegal input of AAA, Should instead ZZZZ
General Diagrams
Schematic of Use case
A diagram of how the different elements and people/processes may fit together in the use case (if possible do not refer to specific technologies).
General Requirements
List any performance or metric requirements for this use case and another other considerations that a user would expect.
Actors
Always identify primary actors, may be more than one. Also identify other actor including any other systems or services which are important. Primary actors are usually ones that invoke the use case and are beneficiaries of the result. They may be human or computer. They are actionable. Other actors are those that support the primary actor, i.e. would be part of the use case without the tasks, work flow, resource, or requirements implied by the needs of the primary actor.
Primary Actors
The actor that initiates this use case is the portal User. Providers may also initiate this use case as a precursor to use case EIE05, Manage Collections/datasets.
Other Actors
Security actor, who authenticates the user requests and issues authorizations for access to relevant data/resources.
Preconditions
- 1.Collection metadata have been entered into the system
- 2.Collection metadata have been validated
- 3.Collection metadata have been published
Postconditions
- 1.Datasets or granules have been identified within the system for further action
- 2.Appropriate action (i.e. Map, download, process) controls have been provided to the user to initiate that action.
- 3.Controls are provided to the user to refine the criteria used to 'discover' the dataset.
Normal Flow (Process Model)
- 1)The user selects the 'dataset discovery' tool collection from the user interface
- 2)The user performs a 'simple' search using a simple interface that searches commonly queries dataset attribute fields for matching text/terms.
- 3)The results of the search are presented to the user with appropriate action controls associated with the datasets.
- 4)The user selects one of the action controls to 'use' the identified dataset(s) in a specified action (i.e. Visualization, download, processing)
Alternative Flows
- 1)The user selects the 'dataset discovery' tool collection from the user interface
- 2)The user selects a control that provides access to an advanced search tool that supports spatial, temporal, and parametric search methods. Flow then extends to EIE11-EIE14.
Special Functional Requirements
None
Extension Points
- <Cluster>.<SubArea>.<number>.<letter+1> something added or a variant.
E.g. AQ.Smoke.1.b something added or a variant
- <Cluster>.<SubArea>.<number>.<letter+2> something added or a variant
- <Cluster>.<SubArea>.<number>.<letter+3> something added or a variant
Diagrams
Use Case Diagram
State Diagram
Activity Diagram
Other Diagrams
Non-Functional Requirements
Performance
Reliability
Scalability
Usability
Security
Other Non-functional Requirements
Selected Technology
Overall Technical Approach
Architecture
Technology A
Description
Benefits
Limitations
Technology B
Description
Benefits
Limitations
References
None