Difference between revisions of "Talk:NASA ROSES08: Regulatory AQ Applications Proposal- Technical Approach"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == Proposal participation from Co-Is -- [[User:JoeVaughan|JoeVaughan]] 14:55, 2 August 2008 (EDT) == | ||
| + | |||
| + | As I read through the proposal on the wiki, I find I have various questions that I'll likely compile and send along soon. | ||
| + | But, generally, am I correct in thinking that I'm welcome to make friendly edits to the proposal via the wiki? | ||
| + | Or is that something you want to keep in-house? | ||
| + | on the discussion page ( explan that it will inspire others to participate... | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Re: Proposal participation from Co-Is -- [[User:Erinmr|Erinmr]] 14:56, 2 August 2008 (EDT)=== | ||
| + | yes that kind of participation is pecisely what we are hoping for. go for it JO | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Erin, this can be an even better wiki experiment than the NSF proposal .. | ||
| + | * Basen on Jo, Doug, Bret , Greg, I am thinking of making EE DSS more GEOSSy, I think they will go for it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
== Notes -- [[User:Erinmr|Erinmr]] 01:11, 11 July 2008 (EDT) == | == Notes -- [[User:Erinmr|Erinmr]] 01:11, 11 July 2008 (EDT) == | ||
| Line 16: | Line 31: | ||
* Any NASA tool for detecting Fireworks? Maybe OMI NOx... | * Any NASA tool for detecting Fireworks? Maybe OMI NOx... | ||
* Using OMI AI/NOx ratio to determine smoke age. Older smoke doesn't have a NOx signal. | * Using OMI AI/NOx ratio to determine smoke age. Older smoke doesn't have a NOx signal. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 12:57, August 2, 2008
Proposal participation from Co-Is -- JoeVaughan 14:55, 2 August 2008 (EDT)
As I read through the proposal on the wiki, I find I have various questions that I'll likely compile and send along soon. But, generally, am I correct in thinking that I'm welcome to make friendly edits to the proposal via the wiki? Or is that something you want to keep in-house? on the discussion page ( explan that it will inspire others to participate...
Re: Proposal participation from Co-Is -- Erinmr 14:56, 2 August 2008 (EDT)
yes that kind of participation is pecisely what we are hoping for. go for it JO
- Erin, this can be an even better wiki experiment than the NSF proposal ..
- Basen on Jo, Doug, Bret , Greg, I am thinking of making EE DSS more GEOSSy, I think they will go for it.
Notes -- Erinmr 01:11, 11 July 2008 (EDT)
- Could 5 smaller events put you over the 1 year PM standard or does it have to be one event that puts you over? Would make a difference in if you pay attention to lower PM values or not.
- Significant, continuous area is out of attainment for the yearly 15 ug/m3 standard. New non-attainment in the NW
- Values you "throw away" (happen less than 2% of day) that don't necessarily put you over 24hr standard (check)
- Check out official design values
- Everyone of the glide paths have markers on them (2006, 2018) - what about interaction of events with glide path (western U.S.?)
- Other anomalies/checks - can't be more than x% different than nearest neighbor or more than y% different from previous hour.
- FASTNet - needs archive of data and events potentially something NASA could do.
- Direct help to States b/c events tend to be larger than one State area.
- Helpful for Regional Haze Rule that the end is in 2064 and they may not recognize an EE that upsets the glide path until much later
- Potential End Users
- Tom Moore, CIRA
- Southeast/Chat?
- Other State/Regional participants.
- Any NASA tool for detecting Fireworks? Maybe OMI NOx...
- Using OMI AI/NOx ratio to determine smoke age. Older smoke doesn't have a NOx signal.
