Difference between revisions of "Sustainable Data Management/20180420 telcon notes"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Regrets== | ==Regrets== | ||
| − | + | Anne Wilson, Ruth Duerr, Philip Tarant, Cyndy Parr, Shelley Stall | |
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
| + | * Plan for the summer ESIP meeting | ||
| + | ** we should use this session to present outline/draft of the ROI paper we are working on. | ||
| + | ** Discuss tables, figs. | ||
| + | ** Assign writing sections. | ||
| + | * Papers we are working on. | ||
| + | ** RoI. We have a lot of raw material. | ||
| + | ** general feeling: | ||
| + | *** the best 'metric' for value will be data reuse (not downloads, or any of those other activity measures -- # users, etc). | ||
| + | *** and the best way to measure that is with data citations. | ||
| + | ** so our paper can write up what we have, then conclude with that. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * NSF Dear Colleague Letter, features RoI work. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2018/nsf18060/nsf18060.jsp?WT.mc_id=USNSF_25&WT.mc_ev=click | ||
| + | ** NSF's interest appears to be more related to RoI for managing the data themselves (e.g., curation costs) not the repository. This is the talk that we have heard from Beth Plale more than once. So not really a propos of our current RoI work, | ||
==Action Items== | ==Action Items== | ||
| + | # Plan for the summer ESIP meeting | ||
| + | ## Margaret: write an abstract | ||
| + | |||
| + | # Papers we are working on. | ||
| + | ## Corinna: start a draft | ||
Latest revision as of 10:37, April 23, 2018
To connect
- Join from computer, tablet or smartphone at: https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/618011013
- Dial in using your phone: :United States: +1 (571) 317-3122
- Access Code: 618-011-013
Agenda
- Plan for the summer ESIP meeting
- Papers we are working on.
- NSF Dear Colleague Letter, features RoI work. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2018/nsf18060/nsf18060.jsp?WT.mc_id=USNSF_25&WT.mc_ev=click
Attending
Margaret O'Brien, Rebecca Koskella, Corinna Gries, Bob Downs
Regrets
Anne Wilson, Ruth Duerr, Philip Tarant, Cyndy Parr, Shelley Stall
Notes
- Plan for the summer ESIP meeting
- we should use this session to present outline/draft of the ROI paper we are working on.
- Discuss tables, figs.
- Assign writing sections.
- Papers we are working on.
- RoI. We have a lot of raw material.
- general feeling:
- the best 'metric' for value will be data reuse (not downloads, or any of those other activity measures -- # users, etc).
- and the best way to measure that is with data citations.
- so our paper can write up what we have, then conclude with that.
- NSF Dear Colleague Letter, features RoI work. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2018/nsf18060/nsf18060.jsp?WT.mc_id=USNSF_25&WT.mc_ev=click
- NSF's interest appears to be more related to RoI for managing the data themselves (e.g., curation costs) not the repository. This is the talk that we have heard from Beth Plale more than once. So not really a propos of our current RoI work,
Action Items
- Plan for the summer ESIP meeting
- Margaret: write an abstract
- Papers we are working on.
- Corinna: start a draft
