Difference between revisions of "Sustainable Data Management/20160720 ESIP summer mtg"
From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Cynthia.parr (talk | contribs) |
Cynthia.parr (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
===Recommendations for repositories=== | ===Recommendations for repositories=== | ||
* take an active role in bringing COPDESS messages to your institution | * take an active role in bringing COPDESS messages to your institution | ||
| + | * create a standards compliant business card | ||
| + | * use re3data as the authoritative source | ||
===Recommendations for liaisons=== | ===Recommendations for liaisons=== | ||
===Next steps for landscape analysis=== | ===Next steps for landscape analysis=== | ||
Revision as of 12:28, July 20, 2016
- ESIP summer meeting
- landscape: http://commons.esipfed.org/node/9139
Agenda
Abstract and uploaded talks: http://commons.esipfed.org/node/9139
Speakers, from 3 points of view (<10 min each):
- Kerstin Lehnert - Repository Registries (COPDESS-Re3Data)
- Matt Jones - Repositories aggregators (Data ONE)
- Margaret O'Brien - Contributors (liaison, perspective from Researchers)
- Also to discuss, Shelley Stall's visualization at ...link...
For each talk and following, we are discussing the following questions.
- How open are each of these repositories to new or outside data?
- What will it take so can we get more data in repositories?
- How to guide people to the right repository?
- Additional fields to add to the registry to help? E.g. Certifications. (http://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/escidoc:1397899:6/component/escidoc:1398549/re3data_schema_documentation_v3_0.pdf)
- Any obvious gaps in services that we know of?
Attending
Notes
Outcomes of today's discussions
Recommendations for registries
Recommendations for repositories
- take an active role in bringing COPDESS messages to your institution
- create a standards compliant business card
- use re3data as the authoritative source
