ModuleQuestions

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Revision as of 11:13, August 31, 2011 by Rduerr (talk | contribs)

Issues to resolve with the module template

  1. Module naming convention - I used the heading of the major section of the outline as my title and the module title line as the subtitle. That provides something of a map that people can follow from the on-line outline to the material and back. Do we want to standardize on that? If so then for example one of the sub-modules of this section would have the title Agency Requirements, and the sub-title NSF.
  2. Module author - Just me? What about reviewer's? Co-authors, etc.?
  3. Module organization - I just used NSIDC, but should I provide contact information? If this were a journal article I would...
  4. Is it acceptable to eliminate redundant pages - i.e., how flexible do we want to be in following the template?
  5. What domains and agencies do we want to be complete and specific on? Where do we draw the line? (i.e., NIH? DOE? ???)
  6. On the references and resources page - how self-contained do we want/need to be? How often will we need to update these pages?
  7. Now how do we pick which other modules are relevant?
  8. At this point I think perhaps a writer's guide is indeed necessary