Difference between revisions of "ESC 2012 03 19"

From Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
*** User stories are "longitudinal" descriptions of use cases, benefits and requirements
 
*** User stories are "longitudinal" descriptions of use cases, benefits and requirements
 
*** Human Factors are pervasive considerations for implementing the Collaboratory, but does include some requirements
 
*** Human Factors are pervasive considerations for implementing the Collaboratory, but does include some requirements
 +
** Also discussed whether Scientific Innovation had relevance to decision makers
 +
*** Distinguish high-level federal agency from field offices and state agencies
 +
*** The latter may be conservative in adoption of innovations due to limited budgets
 +
** Focus on innovation in inter-disciplinary and cross-disciplinary science
 +
*** Maybe also citicen science

Revision as of 08:07, March 26, 2012

Telecon - 19 Mar 2012

Proposing ESIP Meeting Sessions

  • "Hackathon" for technical workshops?
    • Choose a collaborative platform and attempt to populate and/or use it.
    • Would require some prep work, learning about the platform, capabilities, how to use
    • Candidate platforms
      • HubZero
      • RAMADDA
      • NASA Earth Exchange
  • Planning session
    • Session on enabling technologies?
  • Innovation session--choose 1:
    • How the Collaboratory could enable scientific innovation
    • How innovation might be used to implement the Collaboratory
    • Consensus favors #1
    • This led to a discussion on the relative roles of Human Factors and User Stories
      • User stories are "longitudinal" descriptions of use cases, benefits and requirements
      • Human Factors are pervasive considerations for implementing the Collaboratory, but does include some requirements
    • Also discussed whether Scientific Innovation had relevance to decision makers
      • Distinguish high-level federal agency from field offices and state agencies
      • The latter may be conservative in adoption of innovations due to limited budgets
    • Focus on innovation in inter-disciplinary and cross-disciplinary science
      • Maybe also citicen science