Difference between revisions of "Commission 6-8 “use cases” for key Air Quality Data Procesing/Analysis Value Chains"
(New page: {{CandidateAQFocusArea |Title=Commission 6-8 key AQ “use cases” to identify issues/opportunities in important AQ Data Value Chains |Discussion=Two use cases were discussed during the m...) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|CandidateProduct=Activity would produce two kinds of products: | |CandidateProduct=Activity would produce two kinds of products: | ||
# Process of conducting the use case explorations and documentation would produce new shared understanding among the focus/customer groups used, and the workgroup itself in overseeing and assimilating the results---this could help greatly in the task of refining what we meant by “AQ information infrastructure” | # Process of conducting the use case explorations and documentation would produce new shared understanding among the focus/customer groups used, and the workgroup itself in overseeing and assimilating the results---this could help greatly in the task of refining what we meant by “AQ information infrastructure” | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
# Hard products would be one or more reports on the 6-8 use cases, conducted in sufficient detail to identify both general and specific opportunities/investment areas—ideally these would include specific data, data services or applications that could be commissioned immediately. These cases could validate/inform many of the other focus areas identified here. | # Hard products would be one or more reports on the 6-8 use cases, conducted in sufficient detail to identify both general and specific opportunities/investment areas—ideally these would include specific data, data services or applications that could be commissioned immediately. These cases could validate/inform many of the other focus areas identified here. | ||
|NearTermAction=* Commission 2-3 use cases to be completed before January. Candidate use cases include: HTAP, NO2, and AQ forecasting. AQ Workgroup members are asked to provide suggestions to L Friedl for suggestions on use cases and available expertise to conduct these cases. | |NearTermAction=* Commission 2-3 use cases to be completed before January. Candidate use cases include: HTAP, NO2, and AQ forecasting. AQ Workgroup members are asked to provide suggestions to L Friedl for suggestions on use cases and available expertise to conduct these cases. |
Revision as of 11:28, July 29, 2009
<Candidate Focus Areas for ESIP AQ WG | Edit with Form
Commission 6-8 key AQ “use cases” to identify issues/opportunities in important AQ Data Value Chains
Discussion: Two use cases were discussed during the meeting as an experiment to see if working through the “data value chain” at a “moderate” level of detail could help identify/clarify gaps/opportunities for collaboration and investment. The exercise was rushed, and did not include participation from “real users” but produced significant discussion and helped identify/validate many of the candidate topics identified in this list, including this proposal (#10). The proposal is for a more formal commissioning of 6-8 of these cases, done right, with 2-3 being done by January
Candidate Product: Activity would produce two kinds of products:
- Process of conducting the use case explorations and documentation would produce new shared understanding among the focus/customer groups used, and the workgroup itself in overseeing and assimilating the results---this could help greatly in the task of refining what we meant by “AQ information infrastructure”
- Hard products would be one or more reports on the 6-8 use cases, conducted in sufficient detail to identify both general and specific opportunities/investment areas—ideally these would include specific data, data services or applications that could be commissioned immediately. These cases could validate/inform many of the other focus areas identified here.
Near-Term Action/Product:
- Commission 2-3 use cases to be completed before January. Candidate use cases include: HTAP, NO2, and AQ forecasting. AQ Workgroup members are asked to provide suggestions to L Friedl for suggestions on use cases and available expertise to conduct these cases.
- Note these cases would likely re-identify/refine nearly every item on this WG list.
Type of Candidate AQ Focus Area: Planning/Communication